Liberalism and republicanism, or wealth and virtue revisited
MetadataShow full item record
The unquestionable achievement of J. G. A. Pocock's The Machiavellian Moment was to describe the retention of pre-modern values in a modern society. Pocock was notoriously accused of decentring Locke and side-lining the Liberal Tradition. A more pertinent critique had it that he failed to articulate how civic humanism in the context of increasingly commercial societies produced more than Jeremiahs or Cassandras. This article explains how Pocock responded to his various critics by inventing the term “commercial humanism” in an effort to clarify the way in which classical virtue was modified in modern commercial contexts, especially by natural jurists and republicans. Commercial humanism proved controversial but stimulated one of the most original scholars working in the history of political thought, István Hont, to undertake a prolonged engagement with Pocock's revisionist ideas, which ultimately allowed him to answer Pocock's critics better than Pocock, whose voice remained too in tune with those whose view of modern political thought he had rejected. For Hont, Pocock's labours in the history of political thought remained less relevant to present politics than they might become, once the depth of eighteenth-century analyses of the relationship between wealth and virtue was recovered.
Andersen , L S & Whatmore , R 2023 , ' Liberalism and republicanism, or wealth and virtue revisited ' , Intellectual History Review , vol. 33 , no. 1 , pp. 131-160 . https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2146565
Intellectual History Review
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.