Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCavers, Debbie
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Mia
dc.contributor.authorRostron, Jasmin
dc.contributor.authorRobb, Kathryn A
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Lynsey R
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Christine
dc.contributor.authorAkram, Ahsan R
dc.contributor.authorDickie, Graeme
dc.contributor.authorMackean, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorvan Beek, Edwin J R
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Frank
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Robert J
dc.contributor.authorNeilson, Aileen R
dc.contributor.authorWeller, David
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T17:30:02Z
dc.date.available2023-01-06T17:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-23
dc.identifier282799299
dc.identifierca345425-9cf9-4cf7-b4a4-b47513763bcf
dc.identifier36564817
dc.identifier85144636735
dc.identifier000922378300001
dc.identifier.citationCavers , D , Nelson , M , Rostron , J , Robb , K A , Brown , L R , Campbell , C , Akram , A R , Dickie , G , Mackean , M , van Beek , E J R , Sullivan , F , Steele , R J , Neilson , A R & Weller , D 2022 , ' Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography : a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature ' , Respiratory research , vol. 23 , 374 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8en
dc.identifier.issn1465-9921
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC9789658
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26706
dc.descriptionFunding: The LUNGSCOT study is funded by the Chief Scientists Office of the Scottish Government, reference HIPS/19/52.en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality by upwards of twenty percent. However, screening is not universally available and uptake is variable and socially patterned. Understanding screening behaviour is integral to designing a service that serves its population and promotes equitable uptake. We sought to review the literature to identify barriers and facilitators to screening to inform the development of a pilot lung screening study in Scotland. METHODS: We used Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology and PRISMA-ScR framework to identify relevant literature to meet the study aims. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies published between January 2000 and May 2021 were identified and reviewed by two reviewers for inclusion, using a list of search terms developed by the study team and adapted for chosen databases. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles met the final inclusion criteria. Articles were published between 2003 and 2021 and came from high income countries. Following data extraction and synthesis, findings were organised into four categories: Awareness of lung screening, Enthusiasm for lung screening, Barriers to lung screening, and Facilitators or ways of promoting uptake of lung screening. Awareness of lung screening was low while enthusiasm was high. Barriers to screening included fear of a cancer diagnosis, low perceived risk of lung cancer as well as practical barriers of cost, travel and time off work. Being health conscious, provider endorsement and seeking reassurance were all identified as facilitators of screening participation. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding patient reported barriers and facilitators to lung screening can help inform the implementation of future lung screening pilots and national lung screening programmes.
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent1418277
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRespiratory researchen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Canceren
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms/diagnostic imagingen
dc.subjectLungen
dc.subjectTomographyen
dc.subjectScotlanden
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccRC0254en
dc.titleUnderstanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography : a mixed methods scoping review of the current literatureen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.sponsorChief Scientist Officeen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Sir James Mackenzie Institute for Early Diagnosisen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberHIPS/19/52en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record