Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorKelly, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T15:30:06Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T15:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-06
dc.identifier282155962
dc.identifier7f20de2d-5222-46d1-a152-fd2cc53f1a4d
dc.identifier85144186653
dc.identifier000896682800001
dc.identifier.citationKelly , P 2023 , ' Catholic social teaching : a trickle-up response to poverty? ' , International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church , vol. 23 , no. 2 , pp. 206-217 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2022.2147769en
dc.identifier.issn1474-225X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26581
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I offer a concise historical overview of the context in which Catholic Social Teaching developed. A necessarily brief account of nineteenth-century Social Catholics in France, Belgium, and the Rhineland demonstrates how three of the four principles of Catholic Social Teaching – solidarity, the common good, and human dignity – were already present in this endeavour. I then turn to the ideas of Wilhelm Emmanuel von Ketteler, Bishop of Mainz, and his development of the concept of subsidiarity, which provides the fourth pillar of Catholic Social Teaching, differentiating it from broader Christian teachings to ‘do good’. Subsidiarity enables people and communities to pursue actions and policies which are best for them, thus providing a trickle-up response to poverty, environmental crises, and other socio-economic emergencies.
dc.format.extent12
dc.format.extent651873
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal for the Study of the Christian Churchen
dc.subjectCatholic social teachingen
dc.subjectSocial catholicismen
dc.subjectKetteleren
dc.subjectSubsidiarityen
dc.subjectRerum Novarumen
dc.subjectCardijnen
dc.subjectBX Christian Denominationsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subject.lccBXen
dc.titleCatholic social teaching : a trickle-up response to poverty?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Divinityen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1474225X.2022.2147769
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record