Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorProthero, Louise
dc.contributor.authorCartwright, Martin
dc.contributor.authorLorencatto, Fabiana
dc.contributor.authorBurr, Jennifer M
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, John
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Philip
dc.contributor.authorPresseau, Justin
dc.contributor.authorIvers, Noah
dc.contributor.authorGrimshaw, Jeremy M
dc.contributor.authorLawrenson, John G
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-02T12:30:19Z
dc.date.available2022-12-02T12:30:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-23
dc.identifier282411445
dc.identifier812a135c-ad17-4cf9-a4a1-f8639a465fcb
dc.identifier85142939240
dc.identifier000890241200001
dc.identifier.citationProthero , L , Cartwright , M , Lorencatto , F , Burr , J M , Anderson , J , Gardner , P , Presseau , J , Ivers , N , Grimshaw , J M & Lawrenson , J G 2022 , ' Barriers and enablers to diabetic retinopathy screening : a cross-sectional survey of young adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the UK ' , BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care , vol. 10 , no. 6 , e002971 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-002971en
dc.identifier.issn2052-4897
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 757406
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: bmjdrc-2022-002971
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9478-738X/work/124078571
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26531
dc.descriptionFunding: This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (Policy Research Program, Enabling diabetic RetinOpathy Screening: Mixed methods study of barriers and enablers to attendance (EROS study), PR-R20-0318-22001).en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction : Diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) attendance in young adults (YAs) is consistently below recommended levels. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers of DRS attendance among YAs in the UK living with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Research design and methods : YAs (18–34 years) were invited to complete an anonymous online survey in June 2021 assessing agreement with 30 belief statements informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) of behavior change describing potential barriers/enablers to DRS. Results : In total, 102 responses were received. Most had T1D (65.7%) and were regular attenders for DRS (76.5%). The most salient TDF domains for DRS attendance were ‘Goals’, with 93% agreeing that DRS was a high priority, and ‘Knowledge’, with 98% being aware that screening can detect eye problems early. Overall, 67.4% indicated that they would like greater appointment flexibility (Environmental context/resources) and 31.3% reported difficulties getting time off work/study to attend appointments (Environmental context/resources). This was more commonly reported by occasional non-attenders versus regular attenders (59.1% vs 23.4%, p=0.002). Most YAs were worried about diabetic retinopathy (74.3%), anxious when receiving screening results (63%) (Emotion) and would like more support after getting their results (66%) (Social influences). Responses for T1D and T2D were broadly similar, although those with T2D were more likely have developed strategies to help them to remember their appointments (63.6% vs 37.9%, p=0.019) (Behavioral regulation). Conclusions : Attendance for DRS in YAs is influenced by complex interacting behavioral factors. Identifying modifiable determinants of behavior will provide a basis for designing tailored interventions to improve DRS in YAs and prevent avoidable vision loss.
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent522338
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open Diabetes Research and Careen
dc.subjectRE Ophthalmologyen
dc.subjectRC Internal medicineen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccREen
dc.subject.lccRCen
dc.titleBarriers and enablers to diabetic retinopathy screening : a cross-sectional survey of young adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the UKen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-002971
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record