Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorOswald, Julie N.
dc.contributor.authorVan Cise, Amy M.
dc.contributor.authorDassow, Angela
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Taffeta
dc.contributor.authorJohnson , Michael T.
dc.contributor.authorRavignani, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorPodos, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T10:30:11Z
dc.date.available2022-11-25T10:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-25
dc.identifier282257036
dc.identifier463b61d9-bb6a-45db-bd46-de5fe8eaa9bd
dc.identifier85144277012
dc.identifier000895123700001
dc.identifier.citationOswald , J N , Van Cise , A M , Dassow , A , Elliott , T , Johnson , M T , Ravignani , A & Podos , J 2022 , ' A collection of best practices for the collection and analysis of bioacoustic data ' , Applied Sciences , vol. 12 , no. 23 , 12046 . https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312046en
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26498
dc.description.abstractThe field of bioacoustics is rapidly developing and characterized by diverse methodologies, approaches and aims. For instance, bioacoustics encompasses studies on the perception of pure tones in meticulously controlled laboratory settings, documentation of species’ presence and activities using recordings from the field, and analyses of circadian calling patterns in animal choruses. Newcomers to the field are confronted with a vast and fragmented literature, and a lack of accessible reference papers or textbooks. In this paper we contribute towards filling this gap. Instead of a classical list of “dos” and “don’ts”, we review some key papers which, we believe, embody best practices in several bioacoustic subfields. In the first three case studies, we discuss how bioacoustics can help identify the ‘who’, ‘where’ and ‘how many’ of animals within a given ecosystem. Specifically, we review cases in which bioacoustic methods have been applied with success to draw inferences regarding species identification, population structure, and biodiversity. In fourth and fifth case studies, we highlight how structural properties in signal evolution can emerge via ecological constraints or cultural transmission. Finally, in a sixth example, we discuss acoustic methods that have been used to infer predator–prey dynamics in cases where direct observation was not feasible. Across all these examples, we emphasize the importance of appropriate recording parameters and experimental design. We conclude by highlighting common best practices across studies as well as caveats about our own overview. We hope our efforts spur a more general effort in standardizing best practices across the subareas we’ve highlighted in order to increase compatibility among bioacoustic studies and inspire cross-pollination across the discipline.
dc.format.extent22
dc.format.extent2388852
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciencesen
dc.subjectBioacousticsen
dc.subjectBest practicesen
dc.subjectSpecies identificationen
dc.subjectPopulation structureen
dc.subjectSignal evolutionen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleA collection of best practices for the collection and analysis of bioacoustic dataen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app122312046
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record