Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBowness, James Simeon
dc.contributor.authorEl-Boghdadly, Kariem
dc.contributor.authorWoodworth, Glenn
dc.contributor.authorNoble, J Alison
dc.contributor.authorHigham, Helen
dc.contributor.authorBurckett-St Laurent, David
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T16:30:14Z
dc.date.available2022-09-29T16:30:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier281196970
dc.identifiera5fec73d-3f5e-4ded-976f-545bfde0e5a4
dc.identifier85128663666
dc.identifier.citationBowness , J S , El-Boghdadly , K , Woodworth , G , Noble , J A , Higham , H & Burckett-St Laurent , D 2022 , ' Exploring the utility of assistive artificial intelligence for ultrasound scanning in regional anesthesia ' , Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine , vol. 47 , no. 6 , pp. 375–379 . https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-103368en
dc.identifier.issn1098-7339
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8665-1984/work/118800377
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26103
dc.descriptionThis work was funded by Intelligent Ultrasound Limited (Cardiff, UK). Data from this study were included in medical device regulatory approval submissions in the USA.en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) involves the acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images to delineate sonoanatomy. This study explores the utility of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) device designed to assist in this task (ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block; ScanNav), which applies a color overlay on real-time ultrasound to highlight key anatomical structures. Methods: Thirty anesthesiologists, 15 non-experts and 15 experts in UGRA, performed 240 ultrasound scans across nine peripheral nerve block regions. Half were performed with ScanNav. After scanning each block region, participants completed a questionnaire on the utility of the device in relation to training, teaching, and clinical practice in ultrasound scanning for UGRA. Ultrasound and color overlay output were recorded from scans performed with ScanNav. Experts present during the scans (real-time experts) were asked to assess potential for increased risk associated with use of the device (eg, needle trauma to safety structures). This was compared with experts who viewed the AI scans remotely. Results: Non-experts were more likely to provide positive and less likely to provide negative feedback than experts (p=0.001). Positive feedback was provided most frequently by non-experts on the potential role for training (37/60, 61.7%); for experts, it was for its utility in teaching (30/60, 50%). Real-time and remote experts reported a potentially increased risk in 12/254 (4.7%) vs 8/254 (3.1%, p=0.362) scans, respectively. Discussion: ScanNav shows potential to support non-experts in training and clinical practice, and experts in teaching UGRA. Such technology may aid the uptake and generalizability of UGRA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04918693.
dc.format.extent5
dc.format.extent733535
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicineen
dc.subjectQA75 Electronic computers. Computer scienceen
dc.subjectRC Internal medicineen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subject.lccQA75en
dc.subject.lccRCen
dc.titleExploring the utility of assistive artificial intelligence for ultrasound scanning in regional anesthesiaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/rapm-2021-103368
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://rapm.bmj.com/content/47/6/375en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record