Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Lachlan R.
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorJonsen, Ian
dc.contributor.authorHarcourt, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBrierley, Andrew S.
dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Adam
dc.contributor.authorCox, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T12:30:06Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T12:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.identifier281305082
dc.identifier643fa4a5-1e84-406a-8f5e-1d29ad82c078
dc.identifier000856516500007
dc.identifier85138584695
dc.identifier.citationPhillips , L R , Carroll , G , Jonsen , I , Harcourt , R , Brierley , A S , Wilkins , A & Cox , M 2022 , ' Variability in prey field structure drives inter-annual differences in prey encounter by a marine predator, the little penguin ' , Royal Society Open Science , vol. 9 , no. 9 , 220028 . https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220028en
dc.identifier.issn2054-5703
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 600495
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: rsos220028
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6438-6892/work/119212665
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26009
dc.descriptionThis study was funded by Australian Research Council Linkage Grants (grant nos. LP110200603 and LP160100162), with contributions from the Taronga Conservation Society Australia.en
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how marine predators encounter prey across patchy landscapes remains challenging due to difficulties in measuring the three-dimensional structure of pelagic prey fields at scales relevant to animal movement. We measured at-sea behaviour of a central-place forager, the little penguin (Eudyptula minor), over 5 years (2015–2019) using GPS and dive loggers. We made contemporaneous measurements of the prey field within the penguins' foraging range via boat-based acoustic surveys. We developed a prey encounter index by comparing estimates of acoustic prey density encountered along actual penguin tracks to those encountered along simulated penguin tracks with the same characteristics as real tracks but that moved randomly through the prey field. In most years, penguin tracks encountered prey better than simulated random movements greater than 99% of the time, and penguin dive depths matched peaks in the vertical distribution of prey. However, when prey was unusually sparse and/or deep, penguins had worse than random prey encounter indices, exhibited dives that mismatched depth of maximum prey density, and females had abnormally low body mass (5.3% lower than average). Reductions in prey encounters owing to decreases in the density or accessibility of prey may ultimately lead to reduced fitness and population declines in central-place foraging marine predators.
dc.format.extent13
dc.format.extent1350487
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRoyal Society Open Scienceen
dc.subjectPrey fielden
dc.subjectActive acousticsen
dc.subjectPredator-prey interactionsen
dc.subjectMarine predatoren
dc.subjectForaging ecologyen
dc.subjectEudyptula minoren
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectSDG 14 - Life Below Wateren
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleVariability in prey field structure drives inter-annual differences in prey encounter by a marine predator, the little penguinen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Pelagic Ecology Research Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsos.220028
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record