Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLogie, Matthew R
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, David I
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-13T15:30:15Z
dc.date.available2022-09-13T15:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifier.citationLogie , M R & Donaldson , D I 2021 , ' Do doorways really matter : investigating memory benefits of event segmentation in a virtual learning environment ' , Cognition , vol. 209 , 104578 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104578en
dc.identifier.issn0010-0277
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 272524790
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: b7ef3cc6-52a4-4884-a4f9-1ac22f7701b2
dc.identifier.otherJisc: bf69e607360c4b7eaf5bbc82c6d6b4fe
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 33422863
dc.identifier.otherpii: S0010-0277(20)30397-8
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85098971005
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8036-3455/work/87846155
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000661245500003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/26002
dc.description.abstractEvent segmentation allows the flow of information experienced in life to be partitioned into distinct episodes, facilitating understanding of the world, action within it, and the ability to store information in memory. One basis on which experiences are segmented is the presence of physical boundaries, such as walking through doorways. Previous findings have shown that event segmentation has a significant influence on memory, with better memory for events occurring within a single boundary (compared to events that cross boundaries). By manipulating the features of boundaries and the amount of information presented between boundaries the present research investigates the nature of event boundaries. We make use of a virtual learning environment to present lists of words in virtual rooms, testing memory for the word lists as a function of the presence or absence of spatial-temporal gaps and physical boundaries during encoding (i.e., by maintaining participants within individual rooms or moving them through doorways between rooms). Across four experiments, we show that segmenting information with spatial-temporal gaps results in an increase in clustering (reflecting the structure imposed at encoding) an increase in the number of words remembered during later tests of episodic recall (a memory benefit) and an increase in recalling the words in the order of presentation. Importantly, however, the data show that the presence of doorways is not required for event segmentation to benefit memory: increases in clustering, memory for temporal order and recall performance were found with temporal gaps alone. Furthermore, the results suggest that episodic memory may be optimised if the amount of information between boundaries can be maintained within working memory. We discuss the implications of the findings for Event Segmentation Theory and propose an alternative theoretical account of the episodic memory benefits based on temporal clustering. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.]
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCognitionen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104578en
dc.subjectEpisodic memoryen
dc.subjectEvent segmentationen
dc.subjectMemory trainingen
dc.subjectVirtual environmenten
dc.subjectWorking memoryen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectACen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleDo doorways really matter : investigating memory benefits of event segmentation in a virtual learning environmenten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Higher Education Researchen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104578
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2022-01-07


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record