Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMoravec, Matyas
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T14:30:14Z
dc.date.available2022-09-07T14:30:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.identifier281160921
dc.identifiera645d1b2-e53b-4bd4-802c-05a95472ad32
dc.identifier000734708900002
dc.identifier85121677675
dc.identifier.citationMoravec , M 2022 , ' Revealing the counterfactuals : molinism, stubbornness, and deception ' , International Journal for Philosophy of Religion , vol. 92 , 92 , pp. 31-48 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-021-09824-9en
dc.identifier.issn0020-7047
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8477-6065/work/121312337
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25967
dc.descriptionThe writing of this paper was supported by funding from a studentship hosted by the Arts and Humanities Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership and Pembroke College, Cambridge (Grant number: AH/L503897/1, grant recipient: Matyáš Moravec).en
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that the possibility of revealing counterfactuals of creaturely freedom to agents in possible worlds forming part of God's natural knowledge poses a new problem for Molinism. This problem best comes to light when considering the phenomenon of stubbornness, i.e., the conscious refusal of fulfilling the providential plan revealed to and intended for us by another agent. The reason why this problem has gone unnoticed is that the usual instances of prophecy dealt with by Molinists (especially the story of Peter's denial) are highly specific cases. These cases are special for three reasons: (1) because the content of the revelations does not include the relevant counterfactuals of creaturely freedom, (2) because the specific revelation plays no causal role in the immediate circumstances of the action that the agent is performing, and (3) because the agent is not intent on consciously refusing the providential plan intended by the relevant counterfactual. I explore possible worlds where one or more of these three conditions do not obtain and demonstrate the consequences these possible worlds have for Molinists.
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent556520
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religionen
dc.subjectMolinismen
dc.subjectProphecyen
dc.subjectForeknowledgeen
dc.subjectCounterfactualsen
dc.subjectBL Religionen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBLen
dc.titleRevealing the counterfactuals : molinism, stubbornness, and deceptionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11153-021-09824-9
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record