Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMalinka, Chloe Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorRojano-Donante, Laia
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Peter T
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T23:34:30Z
dc.date.available2022-08-12T23:34:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-13
dc.identifier279456298
dc.identifieraba2361b-d63b-452f-8da5-87b98a8fe0c4
dc.identifier85113286700
dc.identifier.citationMalinka , C E , Rojano-Donante , L & Madsen , P T 2021 , ' Directional biosonar beams allow echolocating harbour porpoises to actively discriminate and intercept closely spaced targets ' , Journal of Experimental Biology , vol. 224 , no. 16 , jeb242779 . https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.242779en
dc.identifier.issn0022-0949
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25845
dc.descriptionPhD funding was provided by Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (Danish National Research Council) grants to P.T.M. (27125). This, along with Office of Naval Research Global (ONR) awards N00014-18-1-2062 and N00014-20-1-2709, covered research time at Fjord & Bælt.en
dc.description.abstractEcholocating toothed whales face the problem that high sound speeds in water mean that echoes from closely spaced targets will arrive at time delays within their reported auditory integration time of some 264 µs. Here, we test the hypothesis that echolocating harbour porpoises cannot resolve and discriminate targets within a clutter interference zone given by their integration time. To do this, we trained two harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) to actively approach and choose between two spherical targets at four varying inter-target distances (13.5, 27, 56 and 108 cm) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. The free-swimming, blindfolded porpoises were tagged with a sound and movement tag (DTAG4) to record their echoic scene and acoustic outputs. The known ranges between targets and the porpoise, combined with the sound levels received on target-mounted hydrophones revealed how the porpoises controlled their acoustic gaze. When targets were close together, the discrimination task was more difficult because of smaller echo time delays and lower echo level ratios between the targets. Under these conditions, buzzes were longer and started from farther away, source levels were reduced at short ranges, and the porpoises clicked faster, scanned across the targets more, and delayed making their discrimination decision until closer to the target. We conclude that harbour porpoises can resolve and discriminate closely spaced targets, suggesting a clutter rejection zone much shorter than their auditory integration time, and that such clutter rejection is greatly aided by spatial filtering with their directional biosonar beam.
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.extent9620193
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental Biologyen
dc.subjectEcholocationen
dc.subjectBiosonaren
dc.subjectAcoustic gazeen
dc.subjectAcoustic field of viewen
dc.subjectEcho streamen
dc.subjectAuditory scene analysisen
dc.subjectGC Oceanographyen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subject.lccGCen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleDirectional biosonar beams allow echolocating harbour porpoises to actively discriminate and intercept closely spaced targetsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.242779
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2022-08-13


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record