Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorIvani, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorDutilh Novaes, Catarina
dc.identifier.citationIvani , S & Dutilh Novaes , C 2022 , ' Public engagement and argumentation in science ' , European Journal for Philosophy of Science , vol. 12 , no. 3 , 54 .
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 515847
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: s13194-022-00480-y
dc.identifier.othermanuscript: 480
dc.descriptionThis research is generously supported by the European Research Council with grant ERC-2017-CoG 771074 for the project ‘The Social Epistemology of Argumentation’.en
dc.description.abstractPublic engagement is one of the fundamental pillars of the European programme for research and innovation Horizon 2020. The programme encourages engagement that not only fosters science education and dissemination, but also promotes two-way dialogues between scientists and the public at various stages of research. Establishing such dialogues between different groups of societal actors is seen as crucial in order to attain epistemic as well as social desiderata at the intersection between science and society. However, whether these dialogues can actually help attaining these desiderata is far from obvious. This paper discusses some of the costs, risks, and benefits of dialogical public engagement practices, and proposes a strategy to analyse these argumentative practices based on a three-tiered model of epistemic exchange. As a case study, we discuss the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy, arguably a result of suboptimal public engagement, and show how the proposed model can shed new light on the problem.
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Scienceen
dc.subjectPublic engagementen
dc.subjectResponsible research and innovationen
dc.subjectVaccine hesitancyen
dc.subjectTrust in scienceen
dc.subjectLB2300 Higher Educationen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.titlePublic engagement and argumentation in scienceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Arché Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics and Epistemologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record