Wiggins on ethical objectivity and ‘Des Cannibales’

dc.contributor.author	Etinson, Adam
dc.date.accessioned	2022-08-05T09:30:07Z
dc.date.available	2022-08-05T09:30:07Z
dc.date.issued	2022-08-04
dc.identifier	277587093
dc.identifier	9c8046b4-7029-4eb8-83e0-7551dcdd771f
dc.identifier	85135826896
dc.identifier.citation	Etinson , A 2022 , ' Wiggins on ethical objectivity and ‘Des Cannibales’ ' , Philosophy , vol. 97 , no. 3 , pp. 321-336 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819122000018	en
dc.identifier.issn	0031-8191
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10023/25779
dc.description.abstract	This short essay offers a commentary on Chapter 11 of David Wiggins’, Ethics (2006). The essay asks how we should interpret Wiggins’ defense of ethical ‘objectivity’ given his subjectivist metaethics. An interpretation is drawn from Sharon Street's work on metaethical constructivism, of which Wiggins’ view is taken to be one variety.
dc.format.extent	16
dc.format.extent	137589
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.relation.ispartof	Philosophy	en
dc.subject	BJ Ethics	en
dc.subject	T-NDAS	en
dc.subject.lcc	BJ	en
dc.title	Wiggins on ethical objectivity and ‘Des Cannibales’	en
dc.type	Journal article	en
dc.contributor.institution	University of St Andrews. Institute of Legal and Constitutional Research	en
dc.contributor.institution	University of St Andrews. Philosophy	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1017/S0031819122000018
dc.description.status	Peer reviewed	en