Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFumagalli, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-21T16:30:07Z
dc.date.available2022-07-21T16:30:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-22
dc.identifier.citationFumagalli , M 2022 ' The next swing of the pendulum? Cross-border aid and shifting aid paradigms in post-coup Myanmar ' European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre Policy Papers , no. 08 , vol. 2022 , European University Institute , Florence . < https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/74769 >en
dc.identifier.issn1830-1541
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 280534972
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8d927073-b137-4528-8883-5fe20a85c028
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-1451-2088/work/116274823
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25690
dc.descriptionThe research for this project was supported by the UK’s Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant reference AH/S00405X/1).en
dc.description.abstractThe 1 February 2021 military coup in Myanmar confronted the international community, including donors and aid workers, with a significant challenge: how to ensure that relief and life-saving support are delivered to those in greatest need at a time when international attention – and already limited resources – are likely to come under severe stress in the aftermath of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. From the early 2010s onwards, Myanmar had shed its status of international pariah (under western sanctions) to take on the ‘mantel’ of the ‘donors’ darling.’ This reflected an important rapid change from isolation to engagement in the way that many western (and some non-western) actors approached relations with the country. From the late 2000s onwards, international assistance moved from non-governmental organisations in the borderlands – also based in neighbouring countries – to the national government, and from humanitarian aid to development. In the aftermath of the coup the encounter between the international donor community and the people of Myanmar is likely to be re-defined by a triple shift in the aid paradigm putting earlier trends in reverse gear: from engagement to isolation, from development to humanitarian aid and from the state and government to non-state and informal institutions in the borderlands. With the military regime engaged in a de facto aid blockade, cross-border aid is likely to be the most realistic way to deliver humanitarian and emergency aid and relief to local communities, particularly in Myanmar’s border regions. The distribution and delivery of aid will be best served by close cooperation with local migrant-based community-building organisations and civil society groups, and cross-border charities and NGOs based in and around refugee camps, drawing on their networks and experience in delivering aid during previous rounds of refuge and displacement.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEuropean University Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean University Institute Robert Schuman Centre Policy Papersen
dc.rightsCopyright © Matteo Fumagalli, 2022. Open Access. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) International license which governs the terms of access and reuse for this work. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the series and number, the year and the publisher.en
dc.subjectMyanmaren
dc.subjectBurmaen
dc.subjectJuntaen
dc.subjectCoupen
dc.subjectResistanceen
dc.subjectInternational communityen
dc.subjectAiden
dc.subjectDevelopment assistanceen
dc.subjectAid paradigmen
dc.subjectHumanitarian aiden
dc.subjectCross-border aiden
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleThe next swing of the pendulum? Cross-border aid and shifting aid paradigms in post-coup Myanmaren
dc.typeWorking or discussion paperen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Middle East, Central Asia and Caucasus Studiesen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/74769en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record