Choice, deferral, and consistency
MetadataShow full item record
We report on two novel choice experiments with real goods where subjects in one treatment are forced to choose, as is the norm in economic experiments, while in the other they are not but can instead incur a small cost to defer choice. Using a variety of measures, we find that the active choices (i.e., those that exclude the deferral outside option) of subjects in the nonforced‐choice treatment are generally more consistent. We also find that the combined deferral and active‐choice behavior of subjects in that treatment is explained better by a model of dominant choice with incomplete preferences than it is by rational choice. Our results suggest that nonforced‐choice experiments and models can be helpful in separating people's rational, hesitant/not‐yet‐rational and genuinely irrational behavior, and can potentially offer important new insights in revealed preference analysis.
Costa-Gomes , M , Cueva , C , Gerasimou , G & Tejiščák , M 2022 , ' Choice, deferral, and consistency ' , Quantitative Economics , vol. 13 , no. 3 , pp. 1297-1318 . https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1806
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License 4.0
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.