Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLarsson, Olof
dc.contributor.authorSquatrito, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorStiansen, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorSt John, Taylor
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-11T11:30:20Z
dc.date.available2022-07-11T11:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-17
dc.identifier.citationLarsson , O , Squatrito , T , Stiansen , Ø & St John , T 2022 , ' Selection and appointment in international adjudication : insights from political science ' , Journal of International Dispute Settlement , vol. Advance articles , idac014 . https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac014en
dc.identifier.issn2040-3585
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 280255564
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 189f0db4-780c-4486-bb49-538532c665f6
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 412136
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8582-5444/work/115309525
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/25648
dc.descriptionStiansen’s work was supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 223274 (PluriCourts). Financial support for Larsson’s work was provided by the Swedish Research Council, project no. 2018-01693.en
dc.description.abstractThis article summarizes insights from political science and empirical legal scholarship concerning selection and appointment of adjudicators to permanent international courts (ICs). This scholarship suggests that designers of ICs face challenging trade-offs in balancing judicial independence and accountability, as well as in promoting descriptive representation and necessary qualifications on the bench. The article considers different institutional design features related to appointment procedures: representation, reappointment, screening procedures and procedures for removing judges. Representation is discussed in a series of sections considering full or selective representation, voting rules and geographic and gender quotas and aspirational targets. Throughout, we draw on data on 24 ICs to illustrate the different appointment procedures and institutional features.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of International Dispute Settlementen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectLawen
dc.subjectPolitical Science and International Relationsen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectK Lawen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.subject.lccKen
dc.titleSelection and appointment in international adjudication : insights from political scienceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Global Law and Governanceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac014
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record