Nothingness without reserve : Fred Moten contra Heidegger, Sartre, and Schelling
Abstract
Contemporary critical theory and black studies have witnessed a surge in theoretical accounts of “blackness” as “nothingness”. Drawing on the work of the poet and cultural theorist Fred Moten, this article offers a reading of this recent postulation of blackness as “nothingness” in light of some of the similar theoretical endeavors in post-Kantian European philosophy. By comparing Moten’s “paraontological” conception of nothingness to Heidegger’s self-nihilating nothing, Sartre’s relative nothingness, as well as Schelling’s notion of absolute nothingness, this article argues that Moten’s paraontology presents a more robust and systematic conception of nothingness than those of Heidegger, Sartre, and Schelling. By way of this comparison with these “canonical” accounts from European philosophy, this article highlights not only the unique features of Moten’s sophisticated formulation of nothingness, but also some of unacknowledged presumptions and prejudices of traditional metaphysics which Moten’s work calls into question.
Citation
Leung , K-H 2023 , ' Nothingness without reserve : Fred Moten contra Heidegger, Sartre, and Schelling ' , Comparative and Continental Philosophy , vol. 15 , no. 1-2 , pp. 45-57 . https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2022.2091971
Publication
Comparative and Continental Philosophy
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1757-0638Type
Journal article
Description
This work was supported by Templeton Religion Trust: [Grant Number TRT0391].Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.