Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFox, James
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T15:30:18Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T15:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-18
dc.identifier280130968
dc.identifier69ba2497-0fbe-4b29-b67a-ddc73d767aa0
dc.identifier85132157045
dc.identifier000812923100001
dc.identifier.citationFox , J 2022 , ' Numeracy and popular culture : Cocker’s Arithmetick and the market for cheap arithmetical books, 1678–1787 ' , Cultural and Social History , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2089078en
dc.identifier.issn1478-0038
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2201-852X/work/114977207
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25578
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the the Cambridge Trust and the Scottish Graduate School of Arts and Humanities.en
dc.description.abstractCocker’s Arithmetick was the most popular English-language arithmetic textbook from the late seventeenth to the mid-eighteenth century. Though well known to historians of popular mathematics, the reasons for its remarkable success remain largely unexplored. To explain why Cocker became a bestseller, this article identifies the economic, sociocultural, and intellectual conditions which spurred demand for arithmetical books, before considering the book’s textual and material qualities, and finally its situation within the mass market for cheap print. The success of Cocker’s Arithmetick, it is argued, demonstrates the means by which arithmetic became so embedded in early modern Anglophone popular culture.
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent762485
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCultural and Social Historyen
dc.subjectNumeracyen
dc.subjectArithmeticen
dc.subjectChapbooksen
dc.subjectPopular cultureen
dc.subjectBooktradeen
dc.subjectDA Great Britainen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subject.lccDAen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.titleNumeracy and popular culture : Cocker’s Arithmetick and the market for cheap arithmetical books, 1678–1787en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14780038.2022.2089078
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record