Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, Geoff
dc.contributor.authorO'Hare, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorSheild Johansson, Miranda
dc.contributor.authorAlderman, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T07:30:07Z
dc.date.available2022-05-27T07:30:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.identifier279749103
dc.identifierd17896c9-e1cd-4ea1-9e9e-73565bf86d58
dc.identifier85131412058
dc.identifier000807752700001
dc.identifier.citationGoodwin , G , O'Hare , P , Sheild Johansson , M & Alderman , J 2022 , ' The politics of coproduction during Latin America’s ‘Pink Tide’ : water, housing, and waste in comparative perspective ' , World Development , vol. 157 , 105930 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105930en
dc.identifier.issn0305-750X
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2535-2881/work/113703111
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25455
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by The Leverhulme Trust (grant number ECF-2017-091), ESRC studentship (grant number 1211157), the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (grant number MR/V022261/1),and the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (grant number MR/S03501X/1).en
dc.description.abstractCoproduction brings together a diverse range of state and non-state actors to create and deliver public services. These processes, which occur across the Global South, have been widely studied. However, insufficient critical attention has been paid to their politics. We address this gap in the literature by analysing the politics of coproduction in Latin America during the ‘pink tide’ of the early twenty-first century. Drawing on original qualitative research, this article explores the coproduction of three distinct public services—water, housing, and waste—in three countries where left-leaning presidents and governments were elected into office—Ecuador, Bolivia, and Uruguay. We argue that coproduction is intrinsically political in these three cases; that is, the ‘political’ is internal to, and inherent in, coproduction. Our comparative analysis centres on two political dimensions—subject-making and collective autonomy—and shows that tensions around these two issues were central to coproduction in Ecuador, Bolivia, and Uruguay . The article demonstrates the importance of not treating politics as a mere contextual concern in coproduction analysis and shows that coproduction has the capacity to reshape political relationships and subjectivities. Taking politics into account is essential to understanding the dynamics and potential of coproduction in the Global South. Our comparative analysis also provides new insights into Latin American politics, especially concerning 'pink tide' governments and the provisioning of public services.
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent419321
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Developmenten
dc.subjectWasteen
dc.subjectWateren
dc.subjectHousingen
dc.subjectCo-productionen
dc.subjectPink Tideen
dc.subjectLatin Americaen
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.subjectE-NDASen
dc.subject.lccGNen
dc.titleThe politics of coproduction during Latin America’s ‘Pink Tide’ : water, housing, and waste in comparative perspectiveen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Social Anthropologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105930
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record