Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorTorregrossa, Clotilde
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T05:30:07Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12T05:30:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-11
dc.identifier.citationTorregrossa , C 2022 , ' Experimental aesthetics and conceptual engineering ' , Erkenntnis , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00568-0en
dc.identifier.issn0165-0106
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 279432240
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a751b875-5864-4e91-afcf-cbb894bdab6b
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-6125-4432/work/113061057
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000793676500001
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85129905854
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25346
dc.description.abstractExperimental Philosophy (X-Phi) is now a fully-fledged methodological project with applications in almost all areas of analytic philosophy, including, as of recently, aesthetics. Another methodological project which has been attracting attention in the last few years is conceptual engineering (CE). Its areas of implementation are now diverse, but as was the case initially with experimental philosophy, aesthetics has unfortunately been left out (or perhaps aestheticians have failed to pay attention to CE) until now. In this paper, I argue that if conceptual engineers are interested in expanding their project to the field of aesthetics, which would greatly benefit the field, then they should rely on the existing experimental work of aestheticians. Experimental philosophers have only recently started to join forces with conceptual engineers in various fields, as well as to explore the methodological implications of such an alliance. This paper goes a step further by not only arguing that CE has potential in aesthetics, but that the way to realize this potential is to piggyback, so to speak, on the work of experimental aestheticians. In other words, instead of building a CE project in aesthetics from the ground up, this paper describes the support that CE can and should derive from current experimental aesthetics, thereby making the former’s development more efficiently realizable. Furthermore, I argue that doing so would also be beneficial to experimental aesthetics. Currently, the integration of X-Phi to the wider field of aesthetics is losing ground because certain objections—notably, the objection that X-Phi cannot be of relevance to normative questions—have not been properly refuted. By pairing up with a normative programme like CE, though, experimental aestheticians should finally be able to put these objections to rest.
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofErkenntnisen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleExperimental aesthetics and conceptual engineeringen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00568-0
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record