Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorKaspers, Tom
dc.contributor.authorLiBrizzi, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorCalosi, Duccio
dc.contributor.authorKobe, Yoichi
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T13:30:20Z
dc.date.available2022-05-09T13:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-06
dc.identifier278930758
dc.identifiera1de2e55-6851-44ba-9221-15715a1fff75
dc.identifier000791787700004
dc.identifier85129646381
dc.identifier.citationKaspers , T , LiBrizzi , J , Calosi , D & Kobe , Y 2022 , ' Speak no ill of the dead : the dead as a social group ' , Synthese , vol. 200 , 210 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03512-5en
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25321
dc.description.abstractIn her recent article “The Ontology of Social Groups”, Thomasson (Synthese 196:4829–4845, 2019) argues that social groups can be characterized in terms of the norms that surround them. We show that according to Thomasson’s normativity-based criterion, the dead constitute a social group, since there are widespread and well-defined social norms as to how to treat the dead, such as the norm expressed in the title (“Speak no ill of the dead”). We argue that the example of the dead must not be interpreted as a counterexample to this criterion, and that, rather, there are good reasons to think of the dead as a genuine social group. Furthermore, the dead as a social group exist, regardless of whether or not the dead (i.e. the members of this social group) exist as persons. This view is clearly incompatible with the idea that social groups can be explained by citing features of their members, which is why we take the case of the dead to pose a challenge for the thesis of individualism. We consider the ontological implications of this example and suggest that social groups ought to be seen as reifications of social norms. Another implication of taking the dead to be a social group is that the presence of external norms is sufficient for the existence of a social group, and therefore internal norms are not necessary. We defend this implication against some potential theoretical and moral problems.
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent276196
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSyntheseen
dc.subjectSocial groupsen
dc.subjectSocial ontologyen
dc.subjectThe philosophy of the deaden
dc.subjectNormativityen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-DASen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleSpeak no ill of the dead : the dead as a social groupen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. University of St Andrewsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03512-5
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record