Public perceptions of deer management in Scotland : the impact of place of residence, knowledge and demographic factors
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Deer have a prominent public and political profile in Scotland because of their iconic status, environmental and socio-economic impacts, and the long-running controversies surrounding their management. However, few studies have examined public perceptions of deer management. This article investigates whether rural and urban place of residence and other demographic factors are significant influences on public perceptions of deer management. A survey (n = 184) in rural and urban locations in Scotland explored public perceptions of deer management in contrasting localities. Place of residence, demographic information and self-reported knowledge levels were analysed to examine their impact on perceptions. Respondents generally agreed that deer management is necessary, with fencing and culling the first and second most preferred management options. Rural or urban place of residence had a limited influence on opinions of deer management, with engagement in land-based employment playing a more important role. Self-reported understanding of deer management was the most important factor in shaping opinions; those with greater knowledge were more likely to support deer culling. The findings suggest that improved public education concerning the need for deer management would be beneficial, increasing public understanding of management practices.
Whitefield , A , McMorran , R , Paterson , J & Warren , C R 2021 , ' Public perceptions of deer management in Scotland : the impact of place of residence, knowledge and demographic factors ' , Scottish Geographical Journal , vol. 137 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2021.1920048
Scottish Geographical Journal
Copyright © 2021 Royal Scottish Geographical Society. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2021.1920048.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.