Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRaychaudhuri, Anindya
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T10:30:05Z
dc.date.available2022-03-25T10:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-01
dc.identifier276420753
dc.identifier5db202a0-7b77-4a06-bd3a-ec2def0e2f2f
dc.identifier.citationRaychaudhuri , A 2021 , ' 'This, too, is history' : oral history, the 1947 India-Pakistan partition and the risks of archival re-ordering ' , Oral History , vol. 49 , no. 2 , pp. 69-80 . < https://www.ohs.org.uk/scripts/journal-search.php?parameter=issue&searchkey=104 >en
dc.identifier.issn0143-0955
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5174-4382/work/102330528
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25103
dc.description.abstractDrawing on interviews from my oral history project focusing on the 1947 India/Pakistan partition, in this article, I critically examine the process through which an individual oral history interview becomes part of an archive. I suggest that this process involves an extraneous stabilising, or re-ordering of meaning. The way we use oral histories that we collect, I argue, risks reinforcing some of the problematic political power-dynamics that oral history has hoped to combat. The process of incorporating an oral history interview into an archive is a process of ordering, ironing out ambiguities of meaning, voice, authorship and authority.
dc.format.extent491108
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOral Historyen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectACen
dc.title'This, too, is history' : oral history, the 1947 India-Pakistan partition and the risks of archival re-orderingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Englishen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ohs.org.uk/scripts/journal-search.php?parameter=issue&searchkey=104en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record