Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMargaritella, Nicolò
dc.contributor.authorMendozzi, Laura
dc.contributor.authorGaregnani, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorGilardi, Elisabetta
dc.contributor.authorNemni, Raffaello
dc.contributor.authorPugnetti, Luigi
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T15:30:01Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T15:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.citationMargaritella , N , Mendozzi , L , Garegnani , M , Gilardi , E , Nemni , R & Pugnetti , L 2018 , ' Sympathetic skin response in multiple sclerosis : a meta-analysis of case-control studies ' , Neurological Sciences , vol. 39 , no. 1 , pp. 45-52 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3111-6en
dc.identifier.issn1590-1874
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 278278743
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 1ef1fd36-f950-42cc-877e-e1f2c8599faa
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 28963666
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC5772132
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85030180351
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/25050
dc.descriptionThe study was supported by a grant of the Italian Ministry of Health, Ricerca Corrente funding program 2014–2015 [RC2014].en
dc.description.abstractThe usefulness of sympathetic skin responses (SSR) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been advocated by several studies in the last 20 years; however, due to a great heterogeneity of findings, a comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies is in order to pinpoint consistencies and investigate the causes of discrepancies. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for case-control studies comparing SSR absence frequency and latency between patients with MS and healthy controls. Thirteen eligible studies including 415 MS patients and 331 healthy controls were identified. The pooled analysis showed that SSR can be always obtained in healthy controls while 34% of patients had absent SSRs in at least one limb (95% CI 22-47%; p < 0.0001) but with considerable heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 90.3%). Patients' age explained 22% of the overall variability and positive correlations were found with Expanded Disability Status Scale and disease duration. The pooled mean difference of SSR latency showed a significant increase in patients on both upper (193 ms; 95% CI 120-270 ms) and lower (350 ms; 95% CI 190-510 ms) extremities. We tested the discriminatory value of SSR latency thresholds defined as the 95% confidence interval (CI) upper bound of the healthy controls, and validated the results on a new dataset. The lower limb threshold of 1.964 s produces the best results in terms of sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.67, positive predicted value 0.75 and negative predicted value 0.80. Despite a considerable heterogeneity of findings, there is evidence that SSR is a useful tool in MS.
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNeurological Sciencesen
dc.rightsCopyright The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en
dc.subjectCase-control studiesen
dc.subjectElectric stimulationen
dc.subjectGalvanic skin responseen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectLower extremity/physiopathologyen
dc.subjectMultiple sclerosis/diagnosisen
dc.subjectSympathetic nervous system/physiopathologyen
dc.subjectUpper extremity/physiopathologyen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subjectZA4050 Electronic information resourcesen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.subject.lccZA4050en
dc.titleSympathetic skin response in multiple sclerosis : a meta-analysis of case-control studiesen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Statisticsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3111-6
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record