St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Register / Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

System-level policies on appropriate opioid use, a multi-stakeholder consensus

Thumbnail
View/Open
Forget_2022_BMC_HSR_System_level_policies_opoid_use_CC.pdf (907.5Kb)
Date
12/03/2022
Author
Forget, Patrice
Patullo, Champika
Hill, Duncan
Ambekar, Atul
Baldacchino, Alex
Cata, Juan
Chetty, Sean
Cox, Felicia J.
de Boer, Hans D.
Dinwoodie, Kieran
Dom, Geert
Eccleston, Christopher
Fullen, Brona
Jutila, Liisa
Knaggs, Roger D.
Lavand’homme, Patricia
Levy, Nicholas
Lobo, Dileep N.
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther
Scherbaum, Norbert
Smith, Blair H.
van Griensven, Joop
Gilbert, Steve
Keywords
RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Health Policy
T-DAS
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background:  This consensus statement was developed because there are concerns about the appropriate use of opioids for acute pain management, with opposing views in the literature. Consensus statement on policies for system-level interventions may help inform organisations such as management structures, government agencies and funding bodies. Methods:  We conducted a multi-stakeholder survey using a modified Delphi methodology focusing on policies, at the system level, rather than at the prescriber or patient level. We aimed to provide consensus statements for current developments and priorities for future developments. Results:  Twenty-five experts from a variety of fields with experience in acute pain management were invited to join a review panel, of whom 23 completed a modified Delphi survey of policies designed to improve the safety and quality of opioids prescribing for acute pain in the secondary care setting. Strong agreement, defined as consistent among> 75% of panellists, was observed for ten statements. Conclusions:  Using a modified Delphi study, we found agreement among a multidisciplinary panel, including patient representation, on prioritisation of policies for system-level interventions, to improve governance, pain management, patient/consumers care, safety and engagement.
Citation
Forget , P , Patullo , C , Hill , D , Ambekar , A , Baldacchino , A , Cata , J , Chetty , S , Cox , F J , de Boer , H D , Dinwoodie , K , Dom , G , Eccleston , C , Fullen , B , Jutila , L , Knaggs , R D , Lavand’homme , P , Levy , N , Lobo , D N , Pogatzki-Zahn , E , Scherbaum , N , Smith , B H , van Griensven , J & Gilbert , S 2022 , ' System-level policies on appropriate opioid use, a multi-stakeholder consensus ' , BMC Health Services Research , vol. 22 , 329 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07696-x
Publication
BMC Health Services Research
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07696-x
ISSN
1472-6963
Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Collections
  • University of St Andrews Research
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/25043

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter