Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBrunt, Andrew C C
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorHolland, George
dc.contributor.authorBrenkel, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorWalmsley, Phil
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T13:30:03Z
dc.date.available2022-02-21T13:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-02
dc.identifier275970610
dc.identifier590060e6-4680-4310-bc84-ee8e03fc3fd8
dc.identifier35109666
dc.identifier85128371022
dc.identifier000794243400001
dc.identifier.citationBrunt , A C C , Gillespie , M , Holland , G , Brenkel , I & Walmsley , P 2022 , ' Results of 'two-in-one' single-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection with associated bone loss : prospective five-year follow up ' , Bone & Joint Open , vol. 3 , no. 2 , pp. 107-113 . https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.32.BJO-2021-0148.R1en
dc.identifier.issn2633-1462
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/24915
dc.descriptionFunding: The publishing costs were funded by support from St Andrews University Open Access Fund.en
dc.description.abstractAims: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs in approximately 1% to 2% of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) presenting multiple challenges, such as difficulty in diagnosis, technical complexity, and financial costs. Two-stage exchange is the gold standard for treating PJI but emerging evidence suggests 'two-in-one' single-stage revision as an alternative, delivering comparable outcomes, reduced morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. This study investigates five-year results of modified single-stage revision for treatment of PJI following TKA with bone loss. Methods: Patients were identified from prospective data on all TKA patients with PJI following the primary procedure. Inclusion criteria were: revision for PJI with bone loss requiring reconstruction, and a minimum five years' follow-up. Patients were followed up for recurrent infection and assessment of function. Tools used to assess function were Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Results: A total of 24 patients were included with a mean age of 72.7 years (SD 7.6), mean BMI of 33.3 kg/m2 (SD 5.7), and median ASA grade of 2 (interquartile range 2 to 4). Mean time from primary to revision was 3.0 years (10 months to 8.3 years). At revision, six patients had discharging sinus and three patients had negative cultures from tissue samples or aspirates. Two patients developed recurrence of infection: one was treated successfully with antibiotic suppression and one underwent debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention. Mean AKSS scores at two years showed significant improvement from baseline (27.1 (SD 10.2 ) vs 80.3 (SD 14.8); p < 0.001). There was no significant change in mean AKSS scores between two and five years (80.3 (SD 14.8 ) vs 74.1 (SD 19.8); p = 0.109). Five-year OKS scores were not significantly different compared to two-year scores (36.17 (SD 3.7) vs 33.0 (SD 8.5); p = 0.081). Conclusion: 'Two-in-one' single-stage revision is effective for treating PJI following TKA with bone loss, providing patients with sustained improvements in outcomes and infection clearance up to five years post-procedure.
dc.format.extent7
dc.format.extent337313
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBone & Joint Openen
dc.subjectRecurrent infectionen
dc.subjectJoint Infectionen
dc.subjectArthroplastyen
dc.subjectInfectionen
dc.subjectRevisionen
dc.subjectKneeen
dc.subjectBone lossen
dc.subjectRevision total knee arthroplasty (TKA)en
dc.subjectTotal knee arthroplasties (TKA)en
dc.subjectAntibioticsen
dc.subjectAmerican Knee Society scoresen
dc.subjectDebridementen
dc.subjectImplant retentionen
dc.subjectOxford Knee Scoresen
dc.subjectQP Physiologyen
dc.subjectRD Surgeryen
dc.subjectE-NDASen
dc.subjectACen
dc.subject.lccQPen
dc.subject.lccRDen
dc.titleResults of 'two-in-one' single-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection with associated bone loss : prospective five-year follow upen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.32.BJO-2021-0148.R1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record