From Beethoven to Beyoncé : do changing aesthetic cultures amount to ‘cumulative cultural evolution’?
Abstract
Culture can be defined as “group typical behaviour patterns shared by members of a community that rely on socially learned and transmitted information” (Laland and Hoppitt, 2003: p. 151). Once thought to be a distinguishing characteristic of humans relative to other animals (Dean et al., 2014) it is now generally accepted to exist more widely, with especially abundant evidence in nonhuman primates, cetaceans and birds (Aplin, 2019; Rendell and Whitehead, 2001; Whiten, 2021). More recently, cumulative cultural evolution (CCE) has taken on this distinguishing role (Henrich, 2015; Laland, 2018). CCE, it is argued, allows humans, uniquely, to ratchet up the complexity or efficiency of cultural traits over time. This ‘ratchet effect’ (Tomasello, 1994) gives the capacity to accumulate beneficial modifications over time beyond the capacities of a single individual (Sasaki & Biro, 2017). Mesoudi and Thornton (2018) define a core set of criteria for identifying CCE in humans and nonhuman animals that places emphasis on some performance measure of traits increasing over time. They suggest this emphasis is also pertinent to cultural products in the aesthetic domain, but is this the case? Music, art and dance evolve over time (Savage, 2019), but can we say they gain beneficial modifications that increase their aesthetic value? Here we bring together perspectives from philosophy, musicology and biology to build a conceptual analysis of this question. We summarise current thinking on cumulative culture and aesthetics across fields to determine how aesthetic culture fits into the concept of CCE. We argue that this concept is problematic to reconcile with dominant views of aesthetics in philosophical analysis and struggles to characterise aesthetic cultures that evolve over time. We suggest that a tension arises from fundamental differences between cultural evolution in aesthetic and technological domains. Furthermore, this tension contributes to current debates between reconstructive and preservative theories of cultural evolution.
Citation
Sinclair , N C , Ursell , J , South , A & Rendell , L 2022 , ' From Beethoven to Beyoncé : do changing aesthetic cultures amount to ‘cumulative cultural evolution’? ' , Frontiers in Psychology , vol. 12 , 663397 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663397
Publication
Frontiers in Psychology
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1664-1078Type
Journal item
Description
Funding: NS was funded by a Carnegie Ph.D. Scholarship.Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Empirical investigations of social learning, cooperation, and their role in the evolution of complex culture
Evans, Cara (University of St Andrews, 2016-11-30) - ThesisThere is something unique about human culture. Its complex technologies, customs, institutions, symbolisms and norms, which are shared and maintained and improved across countless generations, are what sets it apart from ... -
Multivalence, liminality, and the theological imagination : contextualising the image of fire for contemporary Christian practice
Dyer, Rebekah Mary (University of St Andrews, 2018-12-07) - ThesisThis thesis contends that the image of fire is a multivalent and theologically valuable image for application in British Christian communities. My research offers an original contribution by contextualising the image of ... -
Valuing culture : a mixed-methods approach to the comparative investigation of the roles and importance of cultural resources in Edinburgh and Dundee
Pergola, Lorenzo (University of St Andrews, 2016-11-30) - ThesisIn Scotland, as the UK and internationally, publicly funded cultural organisations face a precarious future, characterised by funding cuts and a growing need to justify investments. This practical need to understand and ...