Governance as a framework to theorise and evaluate marine planning
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Marine Planning seems to offer promise to integrate oceans governance with a prospective approach to sustainability, most distinctively through the process of creating a spatial strategy contained in a marine plan, hence ‘marine spatial planning’. This paper will show that in order to understand whether marine planning really is leading towards sustainability, recourse to governance theory will be required. Governance theory can provide principles or a theoretical framework for marine planning systems. It can also inform practicable planning, particularly in the phase of setting evaluatory criteria- a phase that many policy analysts consider should logically proceed the implementation of marine plans themselves- but also in broader questions of institutional design. Yet researchers and practitioners are faced with a situation in which there a multiple, competing approaches to governance from which to choose, some of which were developed in terrestrial contexts, raising questions about their applicability to the marine environment. This paper outlines five key major theoretical approaches for governance and reviews analytical debates and empirical findings about marine planning using those approaches. The core question of this study is which theoretical approaches offer the most traction for evaluating MSP and why?
Stojanovic , T & Gee , K 2020 , ' Governance as a framework to theorise and evaluate marine planning ' , Marine Policy , vol. 120 , 104115 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104115
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104115
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.