Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBuncombe, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorPrest, Julia
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T10:30:01Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T10:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-20
dc.identifier.citationBuncombe , M & Prest , J 2022 , ' Making "slave ownership" visible in the archival catalogue : findings from a pilot project ' , Archive and Records , vol. 42 , no. 3 , pp. 228-247 . https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2021.1985443en
dc.identifier.issn2325-7962
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 276009509
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: d23b2190-ad34-4544-817d-de1e4c9e4124
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3266-7390/work/107287061
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000745388500001
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85123404161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/24771
dc.description.abstractThis article outlines a pilot project aimed at making ‘slave ownership’ more visible in archival catalogues. The project began with the premise that it is incumbent upon academic communities and record-keepers to make known Britain’s slaving past and the ongoing legacies of that past as part of a drive to dismantle systemic (and often invisible) racism across the sector. Specifically, it explored different ways of cross-referencing the Legacies of British Slave-ownership database (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs//) with the Special Collections catalogue at the University of St Andrews with a view to updating the information provided in the latter. Six methods of identifying matches were trialled, each of which is presented and reflected upon here. Although some methods produced more matches than others, the collective results point towards the need for a multifaceted approach. Our findings also raise important questions about types of involvement in enslavement (direct/indirect), how different levels of certainty regarding the identity of certain individuals might be indicated in the record, and how collection-level and item-level descriptions might be updated. The project also highlights how our own assumptions about who is — and is not — likely to have ‘owned’ enslaved people can influence our very methods for uncovering those people.
dc.format.extent20
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofArchive and Recordsen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.en
dc.subjectSlavery Compensation Acten
dc.subject'Slave ownership'en
dc.subjectEnslaversen
dc.subjectDescriptive practiceen
dc.subjectCataloguingen
dc.subjectLegacies of British Slave-ownership databaseen
dc.subjectDA Great Britainen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccDAen
dc.titleMaking "slave ownership" visible in the archival catalogue : findings from a pilot projecten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Frenchen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2021.1985443
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record