Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Milinda
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T00:38:25Z
dc.date.available2022-01-27T00:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBanerjee , M 2022 , ' How 'dynasty' became a modern global concept : intellectual histories of sovereignty and property ' , Global Intellectual History , vol. 7 , no. 3 , pp. 421-452 . https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2020.1796232en
dc.identifier.issn2380-1883
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 269224127
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 73436343-942d-46df-9121-a840ff2a3dad
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7657-5626/work/78205128
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85088830029
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/24761
dc.description.abstractThe modern concept of ‘dynasty’ is a politically-motivated modern intellectual invention. For many advocates of a strong sovereign nation-state across the nineteenth and early twentieth century, in France, Germany, and Japan, the concept helped in visualizing the nation-state as a primordial entity sealed by the continuity of birth and blood, indeed by the perpetuity of sovereignty. Hegel’s references to ‘dynasty’, read with Marx’s critique, further show how ‘dynasty’ encoded the intersection of sovereignty and big property, indeed the coming into self-consciousness of their mutual identification-in-difference in the age of capitalism. Imaginaries about ‘dynasty’ also connected national sovereignty with patriarchal authority. European colonialism helped globalize the concept in the non-European world; British India offers an exemplar of ensuing debates. The globalization of the abstraction of ‘dynasty’ was ultimately bound to the globalization of capitalist-colonial infrastructures of production, circulation, violence, and exploitation. Simultaneously, colonized actors, like Indian peasant/‘tribal’ populations, brought to play alternate precolonial Indian-origin concepts of collective regality, expressed through terms like ‘rajavamshi’ and ‘Kshatriya’. These concepts nourished new forms of democracy in modern India. Global intellectual histories can thus expand political thought today by provincializing and deconstructing Eurocentric political vocabularies and by recuperating subaltern models of collective and polyarchic power.
dc.format.extent32
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Intellectual Historyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2020.1796232en
dc.subjectGlobal intellectual historyen
dc.subjectDynastyen
dc.subjectMonarchyen
dc.subjectBritish colonialismen
dc.subjectGermanyen
dc.subjectIndiaen
dc.subjectD204 Modern Historyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccD204en
dc.titleHow 'dynasty' became a modern global concept : intellectual histories of sovereignty and propertyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2020.1796232
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2022-01-27


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record