Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBowness, James
dc.contributor.authorVarsou, Ourania
dc.contributor.authorTurbitt, Lloyd
dc.contributor.authorBurkett-St Laurent, David
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T12:30:08Z
dc.date.available2022-01-24T12:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-09
dc.identifier.citationBowness , J , Varsou , O , Turbitt , L & Burkett-St Laurent , D 2021 , ' Identifying anatomical structures on ultrasound : assistive artificial intelligence in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia ' , Clinical Anatomy , vol. 34 , no. 5 , pp. 802-809 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23742en
dc.identifier.issn0897-3806
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 276356539
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5d7b0a96-d7c7-4f8c-b221-d74af28c1644
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 33904628
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85105479288
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8665-1984/work/101958706
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/24740
dc.descriptionThis work, undertaken as part of the validation study for medical device regulatory approval, was funded by Intelligent Ultrasound Limited (Cardiff, UK).en
dc.description.abstractUltrasound-guided regional anesthesia involves visualizing sono-anatomy to guide needle insertion and the perineural injection of local anesthetic. Anatomical knowledge and recognition of anatomical structures on ultrasound are known to be imperfect amongst anesthesiologists. This investigation evaluates the performance of an assistive artificial intelligence (AI) system in aiding the identification of anatomical structures on ultrasound. Three independent experts in regional anesthesia reviewed 40 ultrasound scans of seven body regions. Unmodified ultrasound videos were presented side-by-side with AI-highlighted ultrasound videos. Experts rated the overall system performance, ascertained whether highlighting helped identify specific anatomical structures, and provided opinion on whether it would help confirm the correct ultrasound view to a less experienced practitioner. Two hundred and seventy-five assessments were performed (five videos contained inadequate views); mean highlighting scores ranged from 7.87 to 8.69 (out of 10). The Kruskal-Wallis H-test showed a statistically significant difference in the overall performance rating (χ2 [6] = 36.719, asymptotic p < 0.001); regions containing a prominent vascular landmark ranked most highly. AI-highlighting was helpful in identifying specific anatomical structures in 1330/1334 cases (99.7%) and for confirming the correct ultrasound view in 273/275 scans (99.3%). These data demonstrate the clinical utility of an assistive AI system in aiding the identification of anatomical structures on ultrasound during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Whilst further evaluation must follow, such technology may present an opportunity to enhance clinical practice and energize the important field of clinical anatomy amongst clinicians.
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Anatomyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen
dc.subjectRegional anesthesiaen
dc.subjectSono-anatomyen
dc.subjectUltrasounden
dc.subjectQM Human anatomyen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subject.lccQMen
dc.titleIdentifying anatomical structures on ultrasound : assistive artificial intelligence in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesiaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23742
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record