Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCarver, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T11:30:05Z
dc.date.available2022-01-06T11:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-09
dc.identifier276614065
dc.identifier74a0a238-2926-4841-8b4e-ee61a40bafbe
dc.identifier85117322227
dc.identifier.citationCarver , M 2021 , ' Survey methods to identify risk of attrition : Measures of career intention and regret ' , Education Sciences , vol. 11 , no. 10 , 617 . https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100617en
dc.identifier.issn2227-7102
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4393-8915/work/103138117
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/24607
dc.descriptionFunding: This research was funded by the Scottish Government through the General Teaching Council for Scotland as part of the Measuring Quality in Initial Teacher Education Project (www. mquite.scot).en
dc.description.abstractThe common measure of teacher retention as snapshots of those employed in state-funded schools may overestimate attrition by failing to consider a desire for flexibility in contemporary teaching careers. When used as a measure of the effectiveness of teacher education, an over-emphasis on classroom teacher supply may also narrow the curriculum to teacher training rather than the more expansive ‘learning teaching’. This paper discusses two ‘softer’ measures of retention, career intention and training regret, to give a more general sense of how contemporary teachers see their career development as relating to their initial teacher education and professional learning. These measures are generated by adapting survey questions from the OECD’s TALIS and the US’ Beginning Teacher Longitudinal Study, simply asking teachers where they see themselves in five years’ time and if they would still choose to become a teacher if they could go back to before they began training. Surveys were administered annually to two cohorts of recent graduates as part of the Measuring Quality in Initial Teacher Education project—three data captures for 2018 graduates, two for 2019 graduates. It is shown how these measures help to mitigate declines in survey response and can give some helpful estimates of teacher attrition with respect to sex, ethnicity, school type, and degree type. The alternative measures are also argued to give helpful indicators of attrition risk before it happens, allowing discussion of how teachers’ career intentions change during their early careers. In particular, it is found that leaving the classroom is a fairly common expectation, but not necessarily because of teacher burnout. It is suggested that asking what teachers can imagine themselves doing is an effective measure for engaging with issues around vocational choice and teaching as a lifelong profession, with implications for how careers in education are conceptualised in initial teacher education programmes.
dc.format.extent12
dc.format.extent251956
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEducation Sciencesen
dc.subjectAttritionen
dc.subjectEarly career teachersen
dc.subjectInitial teacher educationen
dc.subjectTeacher retentionen
dc.subjectTeachers’ careersen
dc.subjectWastage rateen
dc.subjectLB Theory and practice of educationen
dc.subjectComputer Science (miscellaneous)en
dc.subjectComputer Science(all)en
dc.subjectEducationen
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitationen
dc.subjectDevelopmental and Educational Psychologyen
dc.subjectPublic Administrationen
dc.subjectComputer Science Applicationsen
dc.subjectSDG 4 - Quality Educationen
dc.subject.lccLBen
dc.titleSurvey methods to identify risk of attrition : Measures of career intention and regreten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. University of St Andrewsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. International Education Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/educsci11100617
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record