Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNightingale, Glenna
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Andrew James
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorWoodcock, James
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Kieran
dc.contributor.authorCleland, Claire
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Graham
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Michael
dc.contributor.authorCope, Andy
dc.contributor.authorKee, Frank
dc.contributor.authorMilton, Karen
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Charlie
dc.contributor.authorJepson, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-05T11:30:02Z
dc.date.available2022-01-05T11:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-31
dc.identifier276988204
dc.identifieredd8914f-d61f-4836-85fd-d7854c39f418
dc.identifier85122014817
dc.identifier000773555700031
dc.identifier.citationNightingale , G , Williams , A J , Hunter , R , Woodcock , J , Turner , K , Cleland , C , Baker , G , Kelly , M , Cope , A , Kee , F , Milton , K , Foster , C , Jepson , R & Kelly , P 2021 , ' Evaluating the citywide Edinburgh 20mph speed limit intervention effects on traffic speed and volume : a pre-post observational evaluation ' , PLoS ONE , vol. 16 , no. 12 , e0261383 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261383en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2175-8836/work/105957166
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/24597
dc.descriptionFunding: The ‘Is 20 plenty for health?’ project is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research (PHR) grant 15/82/12.en
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Traffic speed is important to public health as it is a major contributory factor to collision risk and casualty severity. 20mph (32km/h) speed limit interventions are an increasingly common approach to address this transport and health challenge, but a more developed evidence base is needed to understand their effects. This study describes the changes in traffic speed and traffic volume in the City of Edinburgh, pre- and 12 months post-implementation of phased city-wide 20mph speed limits from 2016-2018. Methods: The City of Edinburgh Council collected speed and volume data across one full week (24 hours a day) pre- and post-20mph speed limits for 66 streets. The pre- and post-speed limit intervention data were compared using measures of central tendency, dispersion, and basic t-tests. The changes were assessed at different aggregations and evaluated for statistical significance (alpha = 0.05). A mixed effects model was used to model speed reduction, in the presence of key variables such as baseline traffic speed and time of day. Results: City-wide, a statistically significant reduction in mean speed of 1.34mph (95% CI 0.95 to 1.72) was observed at 12 months post-implementation, representing a 5.7% reduction. Reductions in speed were observed throughout the day and across the week, and larger reductions in speed were observed on roads with higher initial speeds. Mean 7-day volume of traffic was found to be lower by 86 vehicles (95% CI: -112 to 286) representing a reduction of 2.4% across the city of Edinburgh (p=0.39) but with the direction of effect uncertain. Conclusions: The implementation of the city-wide 20mph speed limit intervention was associated with meaningful reductions in traffic speeds but not volume. The reduction observed in road traffic speed may act as a mechanism to lessen the frequency and severity of collisions and casualties, increase road safety, and improve liveability.
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent812565
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONEen
dc.subject20mph speed limitsen
dc.subjectPublic healthen
dc.subjectTransporten
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleEvaluating the citywide Edinburgh 20mph speed limit intervention effects on traffic speed and volume : a pre-post observational evaluationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0261383
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record