Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Andrew James
dc.contributor.authorManner, Jillian
dc.contributor.authorNightingale, Glenna
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Kieran
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Graham
dc.contributor.authorCleland, Claire
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorJepson, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T11:30:12Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T11:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.identifier276988087
dc.identifierd4895dff-9ef3-41e6-855a-ca0a00d9f00e
dc.identifier85120472166
dc.identifier000779518800008
dc.identifier.citationWilliams , A J , Manner , J , Nightingale , G , Turner , K , Kelly , P , Baker , G , Cleland , C , Hunter , R & Jepson , R 2022 , ' Public attitudes to, and perceived impacts of 20mph (32 km/h) speed limits in Edinburgh : an exploratory study using the Speed Limits Perceptions Survey (SLiPS) ' , Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour , vol. 84 , pp. 99-113 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.022en
dc.identifier.issn1369-8478
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2175-8836/work/104619449
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/24487
dc.descriptionThe ‘Is 20 plenty for health?’ study is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research (PHR) grant 15/82/12.en
dc.description.abstractBetween 2016 and 2018 a policy was implemented to increase the proportion of 20mph (32km/h) streets in Edinburgh, UK from approximately 50% to 80%, providing the opportunity to evaluate how behaviour and public perceptions change over time. This is important as negative public responses have been reported to limit the implementation of transport policies and may reduce the effectiveness of the policy. The Speed Limits Perception Survey (SLiPS) was developed to assess changes in public perceptions from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-implementation. We collected 3,485 individual responses to the survey, 64.6% (n = 2,253) of which included complete perceptions data. Using exploratory factor analysis, the following perception factors were identified: i) Detraction and resistance, ii) Support, iii) Rule following, iv) Child safety, and v) Walking safety. Following the 20mph implementation at 6–12 months: Support (ii) and Rule following (iii) had increased; Detraction and resistance (i) had decreased; and Child safety (iv) and Walking safety (v) had not changed significantly. These findings indicate that the public in Edinburgh became more positive towards the policy once it was implemented. However, more extensive policy or ongoing communication of the safety benefits of 20mph limits are needed to increase perceptions of safety that might lead to increased walking and cycling. Future research should aim to understand how those implementing speed limit interventions can positively influence public perceptions and how public perceptions about speed limits influence behaviour.
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.extent5226905
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviouren
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectTransporten
dc.subject20mph(32km/h)en
dc.subjectPublic perceptionsen
dc.subjectWalkingen
dc.subjectCyclingen
dc.subjectRA Public aspects of medicineen
dc.subjectE-DASen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccRAen
dc.titlePublic attitudes to, and perceived impacts of 20mph (32 km/h) speed limits in Edinburgh : an exploratory study using the Speed Limits Perceptions Survey (SLiPS)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.022
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847821002722?via%3Dihub#s0095en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record