Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDezecache, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorZuberbühler, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorDavila-Ross, Marina
dc.contributor.authorDahl, Christoph D
dc.identifier.citationDezecache , G , Zuberbühler , K , Davila-Ross , M & Dahl , C D 2020 , ' Flexibility in wild infant chimpanzee vocal behavior ' , Journal of Language Evolution , vol. Advance articles , lzaa009 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 271187928
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9b4b6177-e388-452e-a3a1-05b4871f908f
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8378-088X/work/85167685
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000679603200003
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85108369271
dc.descriptionThe research was supported by a Fyssen Fellowship, British Academy Newton International Fellowship (NF171514), and CAP2025 funding awarded to G.D., funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration (Grant agreement no. 283871) awarded to KZ the Swiss National Science Foundation (PZ00P3_154741) awarded to C.D.D., the Startup-funding of Taipei Medical University (108-6402-004-112) awarded to C.D.D., and (310030_185324) awarded to KZen
dc.description.abstractHow did human language evolve from earlier forms of communication? One way to address this question is to compare prelinguistic human vocal behavior with nonhuman primate calls. An important finding has been that, prior to speech and from early on, human infant vocal behavior exhibits functional flexibility, or the capacity to produce sounds that are not tied to one specific function. This is reflected in human infants’ use of single categories of protophones (precursors of speech sounds) in various affective circumstances, such that a given call type can occur in and express positive, neutral, or negative affective states, depending on the occasion. Nonhuman primate vocal behavior, in contrast, is seen as comparably inflexible, with different call types tied to specific functions and sometimes to specific affective states (e.g. screams mostly occur in negative circumstances). As a first step toward addressing this claim, we examined the vocal behavior of six wild infant chimpanzees during their first year of life. We found that the most common vocal signal, grunts, occurred in a range of contexts that were deemed positive, neutral, and negative. Using automated feature extraction and supervised learning algorithms, we also found acoustic variants of grunts produced in the affective contexts, suggesting gradation within this vocal category. In contrast, the second most common call type of infant chimpanzees, the whimpers, was produced in only one affective context, in line with standard models of nonhuman primate vocal behavior. Insofar as our affective categorization reflects infants’ true affective state, our results suggest that the most common chimpanzee vocalization, the grunt is not affectively bound. Affective decoupling is a prerequisite for chimpanzee grunts (and other vocal categories) to be deemed ‘functionally flexible’. If later confirmed to be a functionally flexible vocal type, this would indicate that the evolution of this foundational vocal capability occurred before the split between the Homo and Pan lineages.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Language Evolutionen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at:
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.titleFlexibility in wild infant chimpanzee vocal behavioren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record