Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Ryan M
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Wilderson
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Thomas M
dc.contributor.authorButchart, Stuart H M
dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, John W
dc.contributor.authorHermes, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Clinton N
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Alison
dc.contributor.authorLebbin, Daniel J
dc.contributor.authorLi, Binbin V
dc.contributor.authorOcampo-Peñuela, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorParr, Mike
dc.contributor.authorWheatley, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorWiedenfeld, David A
dc.contributor.authorWood, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorPimm, Stuart L
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T17:30:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-29T17:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-24
dc.identifier.citationHuang , R M , Medina , W , Brooks , T M , Butchart , S H M , Fitzpatrick , J W , Hermes , C , Jenkins , C N , Johnston , A , Lebbin , D J , Li , B V , Ocampo-Peñuela , N , Parr , M , Wheatley , H , Wiedenfeld , D A , Wood , C & Pimm , S L 2021 , ' Batch-produced, GIS-informed range maps for birds based on provenanced, crowd-sourced data inform conservation assessments ' , PLoS ONE , vol. 16 , no. 11 , e0259299 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259299en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 276892375
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 829aa5fd-4336-4850-9ccc-1b1aeeefe205
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 34818338
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC8612558
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8221-013X/work/104252804
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85120077389
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/24429
dc.description.abstractAccurate maps of species ranges are essential to inform conservation, but time-consuming to produce and update. Given the pace of change of knowledge about species distributions and shifts in ranges under climate change and land use, a need exists for timely mapping approaches that enable batch processing employing widely available data. We develop a systematic approach of batch-processing range maps and derived Area of Habitat maps for terrestrial bird species with published ranges below 125,000 km2 in Central and South America. (Area of Habitat is the habitat available to a species within its range.) We combine existing range maps with the rapidly expanding crowd-sourced eBird data of presences and absences from frequently surveyed locations, plus readily accessible, high resolution satellite data on forest cover and elevation to map the Area of Habitat available to each species. Users can interrogate the maps produced to see details of the observations that contributed to the ranges. Previous estimates of Areas of Habitat were constrained within the published ranges and thus were, by definition, smaller-typically about 30%. This reflects how little habitat within suitable elevation ranges exists within the published ranges. Our results show that on average, Areas of Habitat are 12% larger than published ranges, reflecting the often-considerable extent that eBird records expand the known distributions of species. Interestingly, there are substantial differences between threatened and non-threatened species. Some 40% of Critically Endangered, 43% of Endangered, and 55% of Vulnerable species have Areas of Habitat larger than their published ranges, compared with 31% for Near Threatened and Least Concern species. The important finding for conservation is that threatened species are generally more widespread than previously estimated.
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONEen
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2021 Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleBatch-produced, GIS-informed range maps for birds based on provenanced, crowd-sourced data inform conservation assessmentsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Statisticsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259299
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record