Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWauchope, Hannah S.
dc.contributor.authorAmano, Tatsuya
dc.contributor.authorGeldmann, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Alison
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Benno
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, William J.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Julia P. G.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T13:30:07Z
dc.date.available2021-11-25T13:30:07Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.identifier276797039
dc.identifierb902ffcb-6d70-45e1-b200-9fa3f2e12ecf
dc.identifier000617299900008
dc.identifier85097764229
dc.identifier.citationWauchope , H S , Amano , T , Geldmann , J , Johnston , A , Simmons , B , Sutherland , W J & Jones , J P G 2021 , ' Evaluating impact using time-series data ' , Trends in Ecology & Evolution , vol. 36 , no. 3 , pp. 196-205 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.11.001en
dc.identifier.issn0169-5347
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/24397
dc.descriptionH.S.W. was supported by the Cambridge Trust Poynton Scholarship, Cambridge Department of Zoology J.S. Gardiner Studentship, and Cambridge Philosophical Society; T.A. was supported by the Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT180100354), and the University of Queensland strategic funding; J.G. was supported by European Union’s Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie program (No. 706784), and VILLUM FONDEN (VKR023371); B.I.S. was supported by a Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 Research Fellowship; W.J.S. is funded by Arcadia and J.P.G.J. was supported by the Leverhulme Trust: RPG-2014-056.en
dc.description.abstractHumanity's impact on the environment is increasing, as are strategies to conserve biodiversity, but a lack of understanding about how interventions affect ecological and conservation outcomes hampers decision-making. Time series are often used to assess impacts, but ecologists tend to compare average values from before to after an impact; overlooking the potential for the intervention to elicit a change in trend. Without methods that allow for a range of responses, erroneous conclusions can be drawn, especially for large, multi-time-series datasets, which are increasingly available. Drawing on literature in other disciplines and pioneering work in ecology, we present a standardised framework to robustly assesses how interventions, like natural disasters or conservation policies, affect ecological time series.
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent1717382
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofTrends in Ecology & Evolutionen
dc.subjectBefore-after-control-interventionen
dc.subjectLongitudinal dataen
dc.subjectCounterfactualen
dc.subjectInterrupted time seriesen
dc.subjectCausal inferenceen
dc.subjectDifference in differencesen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleEvaluating impact using time-series dataen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tree.2020.11.001
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record