Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorClinton, Morag
dc.contributor.authorWyness, Adam J.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Samuel A. M.
dc.contributor.authorBrierley, Andrew S.
dc.contributor.authorFerrier, David E. K.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-10T15:30:06Z
dc.date.available2021-11-10T15:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-10
dc.identifier276648351
dc.identifierdbe5ec77-caa1-4ecf-8d90-89fde7b6894f
dc.identifier85118780339
dc.identifier000716926800001
dc.identifier.citationClinton , M , Wyness , A J , Martin , S A M , Brierley , A S & Ferrier , D E K 2021 , ' Sampling the fish gill microbiome : a comparison of tissue biopsies and swabs ' , BMC Microbiology , vol. 21 , 313 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02374-0en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2180
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:06C0736466BB7685B66550F41B817927
dc.identifier.otherRIS: Clinton2021
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3247-6233/work/103137339
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6438-6892/work/103137544
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/24307
dc.descriptionFunding: The research costs of this work were supported by the BBSRC EASTBIO DTP and Marine Alliance for Science and Technology Scotland (MASTS) small grants funding scheme.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding the influence of methodology on results is an essential consideration in experimental design. In the expanding field of fish microbiology, many best practices and targeted techniques remain to be refined. This study aimed to compare microbial assemblages obtained from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) gills by swabbing versus biopsy excision. Results demonstrate the variation introduced by altered sampling strategies and enhance the available knowledge of the fish gill microbiome. Results: The microbiome was sampled using swabs and biopsies from fish gills, with identical treatment of samples for 16S next generation Illumina sequencing. Results show a clear divergence in microbial communities obtained through the different sampling strategies, with swabbing consistently isolating a more diverse microbial consortia, and suffering less from the technical issue of host DNA contamination associated with biopsy use. Sequencing results from biopsy-derived extractions, however, hint at the potential for more cryptic localisation of some community members. Conclusions: Overall, results demonstrate a divergence in the obtained microbial community when different sampling methodology is used. Swabbing appears a superior method for sampling the microbiota of mucosal surfaces for broad ecological research in fish, whilst biopsies might be best applied in exploration of communities beyond the reach of swabs, such as sub-surface and intracellular microbes, as well as in pathogen diagnosis. Most studies on the external microbial communities of aquatic organisms utilise swabbing for sample collection, likely due to convenience. Much of the ultrastructure of gill tissue in live fish is, however, potentially inaccessible to swabbing, meaning swabbing might fail to capture the full diversity of gill microbiota. This work therefore also provides valuable insight into partitioning of the gill microbiota, informing varied applications of different sampling methods in experimental design for future research.
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.extent1500005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Microbiologyen
dc.subjectVeterinary microbiologyen
dc.subjectExperimental designen
dc.subjectSampling methodologyen
dc.subjectGill microbiotaen
dc.subjectMicrobial assemblagesen
dc.subjectAquacultureen
dc.subjectAtlantic salmonen
dc.subjectGC Oceanographyen
dc.subjectQR Microbiologyen
dc.subjectSH Aquaculture. Fisheries. Anglingen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccGCen
dc.subject.lccQRen
dc.subject.lccSHen
dc.titleSampling the fish gill microbiome : a comparison of tissue biopsies and swabsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Pelagic Ecology Research Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Bioinformatics Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biophotonicsen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12866-021-02374-0
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record