Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCharter, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorScully, Robert
dc.contributor.authorLaidlaw, Anita Helen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T12:30:05Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T12:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-20
dc.identifier.citationCharter , L , Scully , R & Laidlaw , A H 2021 , ' “The word that comes to mind is polymath” : medical students’ perceptions of rural post-graduate careers ' , Rural and Remote Health , vol. 21 , no. 3 , 6750 . https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH6750en
dc.identifier.issn1445-6354
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 274400124
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 17bba7e4-3e6a-4164-9b4f-8660368ed3e7
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1214-4100/work/98785437
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85114432657
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/24048
dc.description.abstractIntroduction : Physician shortages in rural and remote areas challenge accessibility and delivery of care to rural and remote communities, including within Scotland. Medical education is a reform priority to establish a sustainable medical workforce. Whilst there is evidence to support aspects of medical education that enhance the likelihood of practicing rurally, the mechanism by which these educational initiatives work is not clearly understood. This study aims to examine medical students’ perceptions of rural and remote practice, how these perceptions motivate their interest to practice rurally, and what aspects of education are thought to influence these perceptions. Methods : This cross-sectional study utilised semi-structured interviews with ten University of St Andrews medical students enrolled in undergraduate or graduate-entry medical education programmes. Feldman and Ng’s theoretical framework was deductively applied. Interviews informed additional sub-themes, which were integrated into the original framework. The final framework helped examine medical students’ perceptions of rural medicine and mechanisms which shape these perceptions. Results : Structural (countrywide) themes included geographical barriers affecting patients and physicians. Organizational themes included perceptions of inequitable allocation of resources between urban and rural areas, as well as limited staff and support in rural practices. Occupational themes included the perception of rural clinical generalists. Personal life themes included the perception of community in rural areas. Mechanisms shaping medical students’ perceptions most profoundly were their experiences (educational, personal experience, or working). Conclusions : Medical students’ perceptions align with other professionals’ reasons for staying in a particular job. Perceptions regarding rural careers included challenges due to geographical proximity to patients, resource allocation in rural areas, and the potential to sub-specialize as a general rural practitioner. Identified mechanisms, which shape perceptions, can be addressed and strengthened by educators, policy makers and Governments to optimize medical education which promotes rural recruitment and retention.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRural and Remote Healthen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 the Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.en
dc.subjectMedical educationen
dc.subjectRural recruitmenten
dc.subjectMedical curriculumen
dc.subjectGraduate level trainingen
dc.subjectLB2300 Higher Educationen
dc.subjectR Medicine (General)en
dc.subject3rd-NDASen
dc.subject.lccLB2300en
dc.subject.lccR1en
dc.title“The word that comes to mind is polymath” : medical students’ perceptions of rural post-graduate careersen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Education Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Sir James Mackenzie Institute for Early Diagnosisen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Higher Education Researchen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22605/RRH6750
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record