Saving sex for marriage : an analysis of lay attitudes towards virginity and its perceived benefit for marriage
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
How do young people interpret virginity loss, and does saving sex for marriage have any socially constructed benefit for marriage? This study answers this question using data obtained from a peer-led Facebook group with more than 175,000 participants, mostly in African countries, particularly Nigeria. A reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze 100 public wall posts and 3860 comments posted on the group between June 2018 and May 2019. Four distinctive interpretations of virginity loss comprising the gift, precondition, stigma, and process emerged from the data. These interpretations were also gendered, such that a woman’s virginity was interpreted as a gift but a stigma for men. The wall posts and comments further suggest that saving sex for marriage may have some culturally sensitive benefits, including trust, and marital sexual satisfaction. Altogether the findings expand the current understanding of the diverse perceived benefits of virginity that move beyond honour and respect to more complex benefits like trust in a union, sexual satisfaction and ultimate satisfaction in marriage.
Olamijuwon , E & Odimegwu , C 2021 , ' Saving sex for marriage : an analysis of lay attitudes towards virginity and its perceived benefit for marriage ' , Sexuality & Culture , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09909-7
Sexuality & Culture
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
DescriptionEO acknowledges funding support from the Southern Africa Systems Analysis Centre, National Research Foundation, South Africa, grant number: 118772, and the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.