Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBerto, Franz
dc.contributor.editorMras, Gabriele M.
dc.contributor.editorWeingartner, Paul
dc.contributor.editorRitter, Bernhard
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-10T11:30:21Z
dc.date.available2021-09-10T11:30:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-18
dc.identifier266041683
dc.identifier6fe0d2f5-0d31-4368-9ef4-77c583005c63
dc.identifier000680862200024
dc.identifier.citationBerto , F 2019 , Adding 4.0241 to TLP . in G M Mras , P Weingartner & B Ritter (eds) , Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics : Proceedings of the 41st International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium . Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society , vol. 27 , de Gruyter , Berlin , pp. 415-428 . https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110657883-025en
dc.identifier.isbn9783110654301
dc.identifier.isbn9783110763478
dc.identifier.isbn9783110657883
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3246-657X/work/68281768
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/23941
dc.description.abstractTractatus 4.024 inspired the dominant semantics of our time: truth-conditional semantics. This is focused on possible worlds: the content ofpis theset of worlds wherepis true. It has become increasingly clear that such an accountis, at best, defective: we need an “independent factor in meaning, constrainedbut not determined by truth-conditions” (Yablo 2014: 2), because sentences can bedifferently true at the same possible worlds. I suggest a missing comment which,had it been included in theTractatus, would have helped semantics get this rightfrom the start. This is my 4.0241: “Knowing what is the case if a sentence is trueis knowing its ways of being true”: knowing a sentence’s truth possibilitiesandwhat we now call its topic, or subject matter. I show that the famous “fundamentalthought” that “the ‘logical constants’ do not represent” (4.0312) can be understoodin terms of ways-based views of meaning. Such views also help with puzzling claimslike 5.122: “Ifpfollows fromq, the sense of ‘p’ is contained in that of ‘q’ ”, whichare compatible with a conception of entailment combining truth-preservation withthe preservation of topicality, or of ways of being true.
dc.format.extent712180
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherde Gruyter
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy of Logic and Mathematicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPublications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Societyen
dc.subjectBC Logicen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBCen
dc.titleAdding 4.0241 to TLPen
dc.typeConference itemen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110657883-025
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-11-18


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record