Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCollins, Yolanda Ariadne
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T15:30:05Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T15:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-27
dc.identifier.citationCollins , Y A 2021 , ' The extractive embrace : shifting expectations of conservation and extraction in the Guiana Shield ' , Environmental Politics , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1959122en
dc.identifier.issn0964-4016
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 275213018
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 02e0a8bb-4609-42b8-85a5-427f82812b51
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85113636659
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000690303300001
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4138-9158/work/104252844
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23854
dc.description.abstractThis paper demonstrates what the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) initiative would have to do to satisfy the expectations of its diverse, local stakeholders. It connects the unmet expectations of REDD+ with a deepening reliance on extractive activity in the Guiana Shield. In it, I argue that extractive activity, which has always been the most significant driver of deforestation in the ecoregion, is further overtaking REDD+’s capacity for meeting expectations and development aspirations due to the combined failure of REDD+ to deliver vast amounts of promised funding to alter unsustainable development paths and the subsequent announcements of major oil discoveries in the territorial waters of the Guiana Shield. These arguments are based on data collected in the early phases of REDD+ readiness through a multi-sited ethnography, analyzed through a combination of Foucauldian discourse analysis and governmentality. I use critical discourse analysis to represent REDD+’s regional interpretations and governmentality to tease out the expectations embedded in these discourses. This combination supports my identification of what REDD+ would have to accomplish to be deemed successful in Guyana and Suriname, the only two REDD+ participating countries entirely within the Guiana Shield. In turn, this identification improves understandings of the relationship between failed or failing conservation and development initiatives and the subsequent intensification of extractive activity.
dc.format.extent23
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Politicsen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectREDD+en
dc.subjectForestsen
dc.subjectGuiana Shielden
dc.subjectGovernmentalityen
dc.subjectDiscourseen
dc.subjectGuyanaen
dc.subjectSurinameen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleThe extractive embrace : shifting expectations of conservation and extraction in the Guiana Shielden
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Global Law and Governanceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of International Relationsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1959122
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record