Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorTimmreck, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorToohey, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorZanchettin, Davide
dc.contributor.authorBrönnimann, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorLundstad, Elin
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Rob
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T16:30:09Z
dc.date.available2021-08-19T16:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-13
dc.identifier.citationTimmreck , C , Toohey , M , Zanchettin , D , Brönnimann , S , Lundstad , E & Wilson , R 2021 , ' The unidentified eruption of 1809 : A climatic cold case ' , Climate of the Past , vol. 17 , no. 4 , pp. 1455-1482 . https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1455-2021en
dc.identifier.issn1814-9324
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 275502104
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5377d716-66af-4394-a90e-501097e8ff46
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85110286550
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000672856600001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23800
dc.descriptionThis research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Unit VolImpact (FOR2820, grant no. 398006378) within the project VolClim, the European Commission, the European Research Council (PALAEO-RA (grant no. 787574)), and the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (WeaR; grant no. 188701).en
dc.description.abstractThe "1809 eruption"is one of the most recent unidentified volcanic eruptions with a global climate impact. Even though the eruption ranks as the third largest since 1500 with a sulfur emission strength estimated to be 2 times that of the 1991 eruption of Pinatubo, not much is known of it from historic sources. Based on a compilation of instrumental and reconstructed temperature time series, we show here that tropical temperatures show a significant drop in response to the ~1809 eruption that is similar to that produced by the Mt. Tambora eruption in 1815, while the response of Northern Hemisphere (NH) boreal summer temperature is spatially heterogeneous. We test the sensitivity of the climate response simulated by the MPI Earth system model to a range of volcanic forcing estimates constructed using estimated volcanic stratospheric sulfur injections (VSSIs) and uncertainties from ice-core records. Three of the forcing reconstructions represent a tropical eruption with an approximately symmetric hemispheric aerosol spread but different forcing magnitudes, while a fourth reflects a hemispherically asymmetric scenario without volcanic forcing in the NH extratropics. Observed and reconstructed post-volcanic surface NH summer temperature anomalies lie within the range of all the scenario simulations. Therefore, assuming the model climate sensitivity is correct, the VSSI estimate is accurate within the uncertainty bounds. Comparison of observed and simulated tropical temperature anomalies suggests that the most likely VSSI for the 1809 eruption would be somewhere between 12 and 19ĝ€¯Tg of sulfur. Model results show that NH large-scale climate modes are sensitive to both volcanic forcing strength and its spatial structure. While spatial correlations between the N-TREND NH temperature reconstruction and the model simulations are weak in terms of the ensemble-mean model results, individual model simulations show good correlation over North America and Europe, suggesting the spatial heterogeneity of the 1810 cooling could be due to internal climate variability.
dc.format.extent28
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClimate of the Pasten
dc.rightsCopyright © Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectGlobal and Planetary Changeen
dc.subjectStratigraphyen
dc.subjectPalaeontologyen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.titleThe unidentified eruption of 1809 : A climatic cold caseen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Earth & Environmental Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1455-2021
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record