Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHill, Emma
dc.contributor.authorMeer, Nasar
dc.contributor.authorPeace, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T10:30:03Z
dc.date.available2021-08-19T10:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01
dc.identifier.citationHill , E , Meer , N & Peace , T 2021 , ' The role of asylum in processes of urban gentrification ' , The Sociological Review , vol. 69 , no. 2 , pp. 259-276 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120970359en
dc.identifier.issn0038-0261
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 275502383
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 081abc5e-ba29-4264-9ebe-9dc18eac02d9
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85099848642
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23798
dc.descriptionThis research has been funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, project reference ES/R00451X/1.en
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses the relationship between the accommodation of Dispersed asylum seekers and urban gentrification in the UK. We argue that alongside other racialised and classed minorities, asylum seekers are vulnerable to spatial strategies associated with gentrification such as neighbourhood ‘dumping’, containment and ‘territorial stigmatisation’, the highly coercive quality of the UK government’s Dispersal Scheme means that any relationship between asylum and gentrification must be treated as deliberate, the result of the multiscalar interests which have a stake both in Dispersal and urban ‘development’. Drawing on empirical research conducted in Glasgow, the recipient of the largest asylum seeking population annually in the UK, we find that asylum accommodation processes and gentrification have developed a symbiotic dynamic, whereby the ‘failure’ of mid twentieth-century urban ‘regeneration’ provided means and motive for Dispersal, and Dispersal provided sufficient resources to fuel further rounds of urban ‘regeneration’. We also find that recent changes to the Dispersal contract, from a dynamic in which resources were associated with housing availability, to one in which they are associated with maximum housing capacity, have created conditions for alternative forms of gentrification, in which strategies such as rent gap suppression are seen as having potential to yield more capital than infrastructural development. Finally, we argue that the respective spatial politics of both Dispersal and gentrification must be understood as mutually-interested, coercive technologies, which work together to contain and exploit racialised and bordered urban minorities. We call for urgent further research into how the asylum border is embedded in contemporary urban spatial economies.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Sociological Reviewen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en
dc.subjectAsylumen
dc.subjectDispersalen
dc.subjectGentrificationen
dc.subjectGlasgowen
dc.subjectRent gapen
dc.subjectH Social Sciences (General)en
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccH1en
dc.titleThe role of asylum in processes of urban gentrificationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120970359
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record