Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSchönegger, Philipp
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-16T16:30:04Z
dc.date.available2021-08-16T16:30:04Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-14
dc.identifier.citationSchönegger , P 2021 , ' Experimental philosophy and the incentivisation challenge : a proposed application of the Bayesian Truth Serum ' , Review of Philosophy and Psychology , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00571-4en
dc.identifier.issn1878-5158
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 275040553
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8c8c4f11-1ba4-4eba-bc54-e28fad79976f
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-9930-487X/work/98785791
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000684907900002
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85112544434
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23782
dc.description.abstractA key challenge in experimental social science research is the incentivisation of subjects such that they take the tasks presented to them seriously and answer honestly. If subject responses can be evaluated against an objective baseline, a standard way of incentivising participants is by rewarding them monetarily as a function of their performance. However, the subject area of experimental philosophy is such that this mode of incentivisation is not applicable as participant responses cannot easily be scored along a true-false spectrum by the experimenters. We claim that experimental philosophers’ neglect of and claims of unimportance about incentivisation mechanisms in their surveys and experiments has plausibly led to poorer data quality and worse conclusions drawn overall, potentially threatening the research programme of experimental philosophy in the long run. As a solution to this, we propose the adoption of the Bayesian Truth Serum, an incentive-compatible mechanism used in economics and marketing, designed for eliciting honest responding in subjective data designs by rewarding participant answers that are surprisingly common. We argue that the Bayesian Truth Serum (i) adequately addresses the issue of incentive compatibility in subjective data research designs and (ii) that it should be applied to the vast majority of research in experimental philosophy. Further, we (iii) provide an empirical application of the method, demonstrating its qualified impact on the distribution of answers on a number of standard experimental philosophy items and outline guidance for researchers aiming to apply this mechanism in future research by specifying the additional costs and design steps involved.
dc.format.extent26
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Philosophy and Psychologyen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleExperimental philosophy and the incentivisation challenge : a proposed application of the Bayesian Truth Serumen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00571-4
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record