Beyond 'native v. alien'? : critiques of the native/alien paradigm in the Anthropocene, and their implications
Abstract
Classifying species as ‘native’ or ‘alien’ carries prescriptive force in the valuation and management of ‘nature’. But the classification itself and its application are contested, raising philosophical and geographical questions about place, space, rights, identity and belonging. This paper discusses leading critiques of the native/alien paradigm, including its conceptual fluidity, dichotomous rigidity and ethical difficulties, as well as the incendiary charge of xenophobia. It argues that valorizing ‘native nature’ as inherently the ‘best nature’ is not only obsolete but impracticable in the Anthropocene, and that the preeminence of biogeographic origins should be replaced with a pragmatic focus on species’ behavior.
Citation
Warren , C R 2023 , ' Beyond 'native v. alien'? critiques of the native/alien paradigm in the Anthropocene, and their implications ' , Ethics, Policy & Environment , vol. 26 , no. 2 , pp. 287-317 . https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2021.1961200
Publication
Ethics, Policy & Environment
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2155-0085Type
Journal article
Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.