Beyond 'native v. alien'? : critiques of the native/alien paradigm in the Anthropocene, and their implications
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Classifying species as ‘native’ or ‘alien’ carries prescriptive force in the valuation and management of ‘nature’. But the classification itself and its application are contested, raising philosophical and geographical questions about place, space, rights, identity and belonging. This paper discusses leading critiques of the native/alien paradigm, including its conceptual fluidity, dichotomous rigidity and ethical difficulties, as well as the incendiary charge of xenophobia. It argues that valorizing ‘native nature’ as inherently the ‘best nature’ is not only obsolete but impracticable in the Anthropocene, and that the preeminence of biogeographic origins should be replaced with a pragmatic focus on species’ behavior.
Warren , C R 2021 , ' Beyond 'native v. alien'? critiques of the native/alien paradigm in the Anthropocene, and their implications ' , Ethics, Policy & Environment , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2021.1961200
Ethics, Policy & Environment
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.