Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDelaporte, Isaure
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, Julia
dc.contributor.authorPena, Werner
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T10:30:03Z
dc.date.available2021-07-28T10:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-28
dc.identifier.citationDelaporte , I , Escobar , J & Pena , W 2021 , ' The distributional consequences of social distancing on poverty and labour income inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean ' , Journal of Population Economics , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00854-1en
dc.identifier.issn0933-1433
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 274878790
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 247084a5-497a-448a-a776-db41f13bae21
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-0279-2032/work/97885714
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85111504101
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000678455500001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/23660
dc.description.abstractThis paper estimates the potential distributional consequences of the first phase of the COVID-19 lockdowns on poverty and labour income inequality in 20 Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. We estimate the share of individuals that are potentially able to remain active under the lockdown by taking into account individuals’ teleworking capacity but also whether their occupation is affected by legal workplace closures or mobility restrictions. Furthermore, we compare the shares under the formal (de jure) lockdown policies assuming perfect compliance with the shares under de facto lockdowns where there is some degree of non-compliance. We then estimate individuals’ potential labour income losses and examine changes in poverty and labour income inequality. We find an increase in poverty and labour income inequality in most of the LAC countries due to social distancing; however, the observed changes are lower under de facto lockdowns, revealing the potential role of non-compliance as a coping strategy during the lockdowns. Social distancing measures have led to an increase in inequality both between and within countries. Lastly, we show that most of the dispersion in the labour income loss across countries is explained by the sectoral/occupational employment structure of the economies.
dc.format.extent59
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Population Economicsen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.en
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectSocial distancingen
dc.subjectComplianceen
dc.subjectEmploymenten
dc.subjectPovertyen
dc.subjectLabour income inequalityen
dc.subjectHN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reformen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectE-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectSDG 10 - Reduced Inequalitiesen
dc.subject.lccHNen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleThe distributional consequences of social distancing on poverty and labour income inequality in Latin America and the Caribbeanen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00854-1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record