Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPirzada, Pireh
dc.contributor.authorWilde, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Gayle Helane
dc.contributor.authorHarris-Birtill, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T11:30:01Z
dc.date.available2021-07-14T11:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier273992691
dc.identifierd4a46895-07c8-4296-ac5a-c8a802326871
dc.identifier000671466200001
dc.identifier85110362930
dc.identifier.citationPirzada , P , Wilde , A , Doherty , G H & Harris-Birtill , D 2022 , ' Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults ' , Informatics for Health and Social Care , vol. 47 , no. 1 , pp. 10-37 . https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500en
dc.identifier.issn1753-8157
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/23548
dc.descriptionFunding: The research is funded by School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews and St Leonard College for Pireh Pirzada's PhD thesis.en
dc.description.abstractSocietal challenges associated with caring for the physical and mental health of older adults worldwide have grown at an unprecedented pace, increasing demand for health-care services and technologies Despite the development of several assistive systems tailored to older adults, the rate of adoption of health technologies is low. This review discusses the ethical and acceptability challenges resulting in low adoption of health technologies specifically focused on smart homes for older adults. The findings have been structured in two categories: Ethical Considerations (Privacy, Social Support, and Autonomy) and Technology Aspects (User Context, Usability, and Training). The findings conclude that older adults community is more likely to adopt assistive systems when four key criteria are met. The technology should: be personalized toward their needs, protect their dignity and independence, provide user control, and not be isolating. Finally, we recommend researchers and developers working on assistive systems to: (1) provide interfaces via smart devices to control and configure the monitoring system with feedback for the user, (2) include various sensors/devices to architect a smart home solution in a way that is easy to integrate in daily life, and (3) define policies about data ownership.
dc.format.extent28
dc.format.extent1347811
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInformatics for Health and Social Careen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectSmart homeen
dc.subjectAmbient-assisted livingen
dc.subjectAssistive technologyen
dc.subjectEthical aspectsen
dc.subjectBJ Ethicsen
dc.subjectQA75 Electronic computers. Computer scienceen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccBJen
dc.subject.lccQA75en
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleEthics and acceptance of smart homes for older adultsen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Computer Scienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biophotonicsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record