Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLuta, Xhyljeta
dc.contributor.authorOttino, Baptiste
dc.contributor.authorHall, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBowden, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorWee, Bee
dc.contributor.authorDroney, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Julia
dc.contributor.authorMarti, Joachim
dc.identifier.citationLuta , X , Ottino , B , Hall , P , Bowden , J , Wee , B , Droney , J , Riley , J & Marti , J 2021 , ' Evidence on the economic value of end-of-life and palliative care interventions : a narrative review of reviews ' , BMC Palliative Care , vol. 20 , no. 1 , 89 .
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:06C90B3177E7E3715BBFDD4CF1D9CFB7
dc.identifier.otherRIS: Luta2021
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the Health Foundation (
dc.description.abstractBackground: As the demand for palliative care increases, more information is needed on how efficient different types of palliative care models are for providing care to dying patients and their caregivers. Evidence on the economic value of treatments and interventions is key to informing resource allocation and ultimately improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery. We assessed the available evidence on the economic value of palliative and end-of-life care interventions across various settings. Methods: Reviews published between 2000 and 2019 were included. We included reviews that focused on cost-effectiveness, intervention costs and/or healthcare resource use. Two reviewers extracted data independently and in duplicate from the included studies. Data on the key characteristics of the studies were extracted, including the aim of the study, design, population, type of intervention and comparator, (cost-) effectiveness resource use, main findings and conclusions. Results: A total of 43 reviews were included in the analysis. Overall, most evidence on cost-effectiveness relates to home-based interventions and suggests that they offer substantial savings to the health system, including a decrease in total healthcare costs, resource use and improvement in patient and caregivers’ outcomes. The evidence of interventions delivered across other settings was generally inconsistent. Conclusions: Some palliative care models may contribute to dual improvement in quality of care via lower rates of aggressive medicalization in the last phase of life accompanied by a reduction in costs. Hospital-based palliative care interventions may improve patient outcomes, healthcare utilization and costs. There is a need for greater consistency in reporting outcome measures, the informal costs of caring, and costs associated with hospice.
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Palliative Careen
dc.subjectEnd-of-life careen
dc.subjectTerminal careen
dc.subjectPalliative careen
dc.subjectHealth care costsen
dc.subjectRA Public aspects of medicineen
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.titleEvidence on the economic value of end-of-life and palliative care interventions : a narrative review of reviewsen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record