Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBisaro, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorde Bel, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHinkel, Jochen
dc.contributor.authorKok, Sien
dc.contributor.authorStojanovic, Tim
dc.contributor.authorWare, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-26T23:35:59Z
dc.date.available2021-06-26T23:35:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier268761985
dc.identifier45798885-37d9-4121-b127-bb9e7b1a49a0
dc.identifier85086900891
dc.identifier000571832000004
dc.identifier.citationBisaro , A , de Bel , M , Hinkel , J , Kok , S , Stojanovic , T & Ware , D 2020 , ' Multilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction : a public finance perspective ' , Environmental Science and Policy , vol. 112 , pp. 203-212 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.018en
dc.identifier.issn1462-9011
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8936-2299/work/76777131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/23425
dc.descriptionAuthors acknowledge funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant 642018 (GREEN‐WIN project) and funding from the project INSeaPTION as part of ERA4CS, an ERA‐NET initiated by JPI Climate, and funded by BMBF (DE), MINECO (ES), NWO (NL), and ANR (FR) with co-funding by the European Union (Grant 690462).en
dc.description.abstractCoastal flood risk reduction (CFRR) presents a significant public funding challenge, due to its high upfront costs and long-term benefits, and this challenge will increase with future sea-level rise. The funding challenge necessarily involves multiple levels of government, due to the regional nature of CFRR public goods involved. Yet there has been little research comparing such multilevel arrangements across countries, and in particular exploring the performance of public funding arrangements for providing coastal flood risk reduction. We address this gap, applying fiscal federalism to develop a multilevel governance analysis of public decision-making and fiscal authorities for CFRR in the Netherlands, Germany, the UK and Australia. For each country, we locate key decision-making and fiscal authorities in multilevel governance arrangements, and analyse their alignment with the benefits of CFRR measures (spillovers). We find diverse coastal flood risk governance arrangements ranging from highly centralised (NL), mixed arrangements, involving regional centralisation (Germany) or partial devolvement (UK), to full decentralisation (AUS). Further, we find that in accordance with fiscal federalism, multilevel coastal flood risk governance arrangements are generally reflective of the distribution of the benefits across different levels of government, with some exceptions (Germany and UK). Finally, exploring the outlook of current arrangements under sea-level rise, we find that major fiscal redistributions may be put under pressure by rising costs likely under SLR and future coastal development. This is particularly the case for those systems which operate under hazard-based, as opposed to risk-based, coastal protection policies. Further, we find that both fully and moderately decentralised arrangements may require greater central support for alternative measures, such as retreat, in light of growing financial burdens on local governments.
dc.format.extent358835
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Policyen
dc.subjectMultilevel governanceen
dc.subjectFiscal federalismen
dc.subjectFloodingen
dc.subjectSea-level riseen
dc.subjectAdaptationen
dc.subjectPublic financeen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subjectHJ Public Financeen
dc.subject3rd-NDASen
dc.subject.lccG1en
dc.subject.lccHJen
dc.titleMultilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction : a public finance perspectiveen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Coastal Resources Management Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.018
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-06-27


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record