Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBueno-Guerra, Nereida
dc.contributor.authorColell, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorCall, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-05T23:46:21Z
dc.date.available2021-06-05T23:46:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-06
dc.identifier.citationBueno-Guerra , N , Colell , M & Call , J 2020 , ' Effects of indirect reputation and type of rearing on food choices in chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) ' , Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology , vol. 74 , no. 6 , 79 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02861-wen
dc.identifier.issn0340-5443
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 268723680
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 554927a6-7f3a-4f6a-abd6-c80c2f44b95b
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85086015568
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8597-8336/work/76387036
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000540456500003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23316
dc.descriptionThis study was funded by a FPU12/00409 scholarship from the Ministry of Education of Spain granted by NBG.en
dc.description.abstractChimpanzees and humans establish preferences over individuals they may benefit more from through scoring indirect reputation. However, humans prefer prosocial individuals even at their own cost. Giving preference to prosocial reputation over material rewards might have permitted the establishment of cooperative human societies. We tested the evolutionary roots of this propensity: importantly, in our study, the reputation scored had no food involved. Eighteen chimpanzees watched a performance where an antisocial experimenter hit a human victim and a prosocial experimenter interrupted the fight and consoled the victim. Next, the chimpanzees begged food from one of them. In Phase 2, the experimenters offered different food amounts (antisocial + 4 vs. prosocial + 1). Chimpanzees significantly prioritized rewards over reputation (i.e., chose antisocial). In Phase 3, both experimenters offered two pieces of food. Most of the subjects showed indifference to reputation (i.e., chose randomly). Watching fights produced significantly more arousal than consolations. Emotional engagement could not account for chimpanzees’ choices since their choices varied between phases but their arousal did not. Ontogeny and rearing history might play a role in chimpanzees’ choices: the adolescent males (n = 3) consistently chose the antisocial individual whereas hand-reared subjects chose significantly different from mother-reared. We discuss whether the valence of the reputation is species-specific.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiologyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02861-wen
dc.subjectChimpanzeesen
dc.subjectImage scoringen
dc.subjectMoralityen
dc.subjectRearingen
dc.subjectReputationen
dc.subjectEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematicsen
dc.subjectAnimal Science and Zoologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.titleEffects of indirect reputation and type of rearing on food choices in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02861-w
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-06-06


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record